{"title":"Hoping for community in a technologically decelerated world - A critical utopian approach","authors":"Annekatrin Bock , Felicitas Macgilchrist , Kerstin Rabenstein , Nadine Wagener-Böck","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Against the backdrop of technological acceleration during the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper addresses <em>how educational practitioners’ hopes articulate a critique of the present and simultaneously give voice to (im)possible futures</em>. Drawing on Bloch's \"principle of hope\" (1995), Appadurai's \"traces of future\" (2021) and Levitas’ \"utopia as method\" (2013), we utilize a critical utopian approach inspired by Muñoz (2009). We interviewed educational practitioners who worked with young people during the pandemic, and identify three themes articulating our interviewees’ hopes for technologically decelerated futures: 1) <em>young people’s participation</em> in decision-making, which is linked to the wish for more <em>visibility</em> for young people in the future; 2) <em>mutual care</em>, which is interwoven with the wish for support in young people’s lives to be more <em>reliable</em>; 3) <em>appreciation</em> for other groups, opinions and ways of life, which is linked to the wish for more future interpersonal <em>understanding</em>. These three themes point to an overarching desire for <em>solidarity in community</em> which needs time, occasions, role models and spaces of encounter. We discuss the priority of technologically decelerated hopes and conclude with implications for future research that brings together imaginations of futures, observations of practical action and designs for future artefacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001174/pdfft?md5=b8eb972129794bdeb8679433fcb68f38&pid=1-s2.0-S0016328724001174-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Against the backdrop of technological acceleration during the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper addresses how educational practitioners’ hopes articulate a critique of the present and simultaneously give voice to (im)possible futures. Drawing on Bloch's "principle of hope" (1995), Appadurai's "traces of future" (2021) and Levitas’ "utopia as method" (2013), we utilize a critical utopian approach inspired by Muñoz (2009). We interviewed educational practitioners who worked with young people during the pandemic, and identify three themes articulating our interviewees’ hopes for technologically decelerated futures: 1) young people’s participation in decision-making, which is linked to the wish for more visibility for young people in the future; 2) mutual care, which is interwoven with the wish for support in young people’s lives to be more reliable; 3) appreciation for other groups, opinions and ways of life, which is linked to the wish for more future interpersonal understanding. These three themes point to an overarching desire for solidarity in community which needs time, occasions, role models and spaces of encounter. We discuss the priority of technologically decelerated hopes and conclude with implications for future research that brings together imaginations of futures, observations of practical action and designs for future artefacts.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures