Bushfire exposure is associated with darker color of beef loin at grading

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Melindee Hastie , Graham Hepworth , Alison Hillman , Caitlin Pfeiffer , Brendan Cowled , Robyn Warner
{"title":"Bushfire exposure is associated with darker color of beef loin at grading","authors":"Melindee Hastie ,&nbsp;Graham Hepworth ,&nbsp;Alison Hillman ,&nbsp;Caitlin Pfeiffer ,&nbsp;Brendan Cowled ,&nbsp;Robyn Warner","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effect of bushfires (also known as wildfires) on the Australian livestock industry extends beyond the direct loss of animals and farming assets, with anecdotal reports of increased incidence of dark meat color defects in beef carcasses at grading (AUSMEAT color score &gt;3) from bushfire affected cattle. To understand the association between bushfire exposure and meat color, an investigation using historical MSA (Meat Standards Australia) grading data, pasture data and bushfire data over two bushfire seasons (2018–2019, 2019–2020) was conducted. For bushfire affected beef cattle (<em>n</em> = 451 299), predictive models were developed to estimate the association between bushfire exposure and (1) loin color at grading, and (2) the incidence of ‘dark color’ defects. Both models incorporated bushfire exposure, production, and animal variables, with hierarchical random effects specified as plant/processing date/consignment. For the two predictive models, distance of the animal's originating property from closest bushfire (km), the days the animal was exposed to bushfire, feed type (grass, grain), the use of hormone growth promotants (HGPs; no, yes), the interaction of distance of property from closest bushfire and feed type, and days of bushfire and HGP treatment, were all significant predictors of loin color outcomes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 for all). Model 1 indicated that as distance from closest bushfire decreased, loin from grain-fed animals had darker color (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and that as days of bushfire exposure increased, HGP treatment exacerbated dark color outcomes for grain-fed animals but had little effect on the consistently high color scores of grass-fed HGP treated animals (<em>P</em> = 0.001). For model 2, the highest predicted proportion of dark color defects (11.8 %) was for grass-fed, HGP treated cattle, 10 km from the closest bushfire and exposed to 150 days of bushfire. The lowest predicted proportion of dark colour carcasses (1.3 %) was for grain fed, non-HGP treated cattle, 30 km from the closest bushfire, with no change associated with increasing days of bushfire. Cattle can be categorized in order of increasing susceptibility to dark color defects as a result of being exposed to bushfires; grain-fed cattle with no HGPs were the least susceptible to dark color defects, and grass-fed cattle with HGP treatment were the most susceptible. Remediation strategies are discussed in relation to cattle susceptibility to adverse loin meat color outcomes associated with bushfire exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 105527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001331/pdfft?md5=5bb497c48a6e3ae231eb27f31a569122&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001331-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of bushfires (also known as wildfires) on the Australian livestock industry extends beyond the direct loss of animals and farming assets, with anecdotal reports of increased incidence of dark meat color defects in beef carcasses at grading (AUSMEAT color score >3) from bushfire affected cattle. To understand the association between bushfire exposure and meat color, an investigation using historical MSA (Meat Standards Australia) grading data, pasture data and bushfire data over two bushfire seasons (2018–2019, 2019–2020) was conducted. For bushfire affected beef cattle (n = 451 299), predictive models were developed to estimate the association between bushfire exposure and (1) loin color at grading, and (2) the incidence of ‘dark color’ defects. Both models incorporated bushfire exposure, production, and animal variables, with hierarchical random effects specified as plant/processing date/consignment. For the two predictive models, distance of the animal's originating property from closest bushfire (km), the days the animal was exposed to bushfire, feed type (grass, grain), the use of hormone growth promotants (HGPs; no, yes), the interaction of distance of property from closest bushfire and feed type, and days of bushfire and HGP treatment, were all significant predictors of loin color outcomes (P < 0.05 for all). Model 1 indicated that as distance from closest bushfire decreased, loin from grain-fed animals had darker color (P < 0.001), and that as days of bushfire exposure increased, HGP treatment exacerbated dark color outcomes for grain-fed animals but had little effect on the consistently high color scores of grass-fed HGP treated animals (P = 0.001). For model 2, the highest predicted proportion of dark color defects (11.8 %) was for grass-fed, HGP treated cattle, 10 km from the closest bushfire and exposed to 150 days of bushfire. The lowest predicted proportion of dark colour carcasses (1.3 %) was for grain fed, non-HGP treated cattle, 30 km from the closest bushfire, with no change associated with increasing days of bushfire. Cattle can be categorized in order of increasing susceptibility to dark color defects as a result of being exposed to bushfires; grain-fed cattle with no HGPs were the least susceptible to dark color defects, and grass-fed cattle with HGP treatment were the most susceptible. Remediation strategies are discussed in relation to cattle susceptibility to adverse loin meat color outcomes associated with bushfire exposure.

在分级时,丛林火灾与牛里脊肉颜色较深有关。
丛林火灾(又称野火)对澳大利亚畜牧业的影响不仅仅是动物和农业资产的直接损失,据传闻,受丛林火灾影响的牛在分级(AUSMEAT颜色评分>3)时,牛肉胴体深肉色缺陷的发生率增加。为了解丛林火灾暴露与肉色之间的关联,我们利用两个丛林火灾季节(2018-2019 年、2019-2020 年)的历史 MSA(澳大利亚肉类标准)分级数据、牧场数据和丛林火灾数据开展了一项调查。针对受丛林火灾影响的肉牛(n = 451 299),开发了预测模型来估计丛林火灾暴露与(1)分级时的腰部颜色和(2)"深色 "缺陷发生率之间的关联。这两个模型都包含丛林火灾暴露、生产和动物变量,分层随机效应指定为工厂/加工日期/寄售。在这两个预测模型中,动物原产地与最近丛林火场的距离(千米)、动物暴露于丛林火场的天数、饲料类型(草料、谷物)、激素生长促进剂(HGPs)的使用情况、动物原产地与最近丛林火场的距离与饲料类型的交互作用、丛林火场与激素生长促进剂处理的天数,都是里脊肉颜色结果的显著预测因子(P < 0.05)。模型 1 表明,随着与最近丛林火灾的距离缩短,谷物饲喂动物的里脊肉颜色更深(P < 0.001);随着丛林火灾暴露天数的增加,HGP 处理会加剧谷物饲喂动物的深色结果,但对草饲 HGP 处理动物的持续高颜色得分几乎没有影响(P = 0.001)。在模型 2 中,距离最近的灌木林火 10 公里且暴露于灌木林火 150 天的草饲 HGP 处理牛的深色缺陷预测比例最高(11.8%)。胴体深色缺陷预测比例最低(1.3%)的是谷物喂养、未经 HGP 处理的牛,距离最近的灌木林火 30 公里,灌木林火天数的增加与之无关。牛群因暴露于丛林火灾而出现深色缺陷的几率依次递增;未使用 HGP 的谷物饲养牛群最不容易出现深色缺陷,而使用 HGP 的草饲牛群最容易出现深色缺陷。本文讨论了与丛林火灾相关的牛易受腰部肉色不良影响的补救策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信