The role of elagolix in ovulation suppression during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective cohort study

David Soliman M.Sc. , Rita Naoom B.Sc. , Mohamed Zaied B.Sc. , Samuel Soliman M.D.
{"title":"The role of elagolix in ovulation suppression during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"David Soliman M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Rita Naoom B.Sc. ,&nbsp;Mohamed Zaied B.Sc. ,&nbsp;Samuel Soliman M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes for the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist elagolix (E) to the conventionally used injectable GnRH antagonist ganirelix (G) for achieving pituitary gonadotropin suppression during a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Private university-affiliated fertility center.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>One hundred and ninety-four infertility patients receiving either E or G for pituitary suppression during the COS cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Use of E for ovulation suppression during the COS cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and cycle cancellation rates were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage, fertilization, and blastulation rates.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>The groups did not differ in their baseline demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, hormone profiles, total dosage of gonadotropins, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of embryos transferred). The overall cycle cancellation rates were 7.0% and 4.9% for e and G, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. For the frozen embryo transfers, the biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 74.5%, 51.0%, and 31.6%, respectively. For G, these were 55.9%, 39.8%, and 28.8%. Out of these outcomes, only the biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly different. For the fresh embryo transfers, biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 33.3%, 33.3%, and 0.0%, and for G, they were 37.5%, 25.0%, and 33.3%. None of the differences reached significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>The oral GnRH antagonist, E, may be as effective as the injected antagonist, G, regarding embryological and clinical outcomes and could offer a less invasive, more cost-effective, and “patient-friendly” approach to pituitary suppression for in vitro fertilization treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 356-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes for the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist elagolix (E) to the conventionally used injectable GnRH antagonist ganirelix (G) for achieving pituitary gonadotropin suppression during a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Private university-affiliated fertility center.

Patient(s)

One hundred and ninety-four infertility patients receiving either E or G for pituitary suppression during the COS cycle.

Exposure

Use of E for ovulation suppression during the COS cycle.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and cycle cancellation rates were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage, fertilization, and blastulation rates.

Result(s)

The groups did not differ in their baseline demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, hormone profiles, total dosage of gonadotropins, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of embryos transferred). The overall cycle cancellation rates were 7.0% and 4.9% for e and G, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. For the frozen embryo transfers, the biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 74.5%, 51.0%, and 31.6%, respectively. For G, these were 55.9%, 39.8%, and 28.8%. Out of these outcomes, only the biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly different. For the fresh embryo transfers, biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 33.3%, 33.3%, and 0.0%, and for G, they were 37.5%, 25.0%, and 33.3%. None of the differences reached significance.

Conclusion(s)

The oral GnRH antagonist, E, may be as effective as the injected antagonist, G, regarding embryological and clinical outcomes and could offer a less invasive, more cost-effective, and “patient-friendly” approach to pituitary suppression for in vitro fertilization treatment.
艾拉戈利在控制性卵巢刺激过程中抑制排卵的作用 一项回顾性队列研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信