Evaluation of Different Materials used in Prosthetic of Dental Implants: A Comparitive Study

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Md Miftah ur Rahman, Rupasree Gundala, Kavita Gupta, Diptesh S. Rami, Nilesh Bhanawat, H. Dewan, Vilas Patel, Sirisha Kommuri
{"title":"Evaluation of Different Materials used in Prosthetic of Dental Implants: A Comparitive Study","authors":"Md Miftah ur Rahman, Rupasree Gundala, Kavita Gupta, Diptesh S. Rami, Nilesh Bhanawat, H. Dewan, Vilas Patel, Sirisha Kommuri","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_272_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Implant-supported prostheses have become a cornerstone of restorative dentistry, offering patients an effective solution for missing teeth. However, the choice of material for these prostheses can significantly impact their maintenance requirements and long-term success.\n \n \n \n Patient records of individuals who received implant-supported prostheses over a 2-year period were reviewed. Data on maintenance interventions, including adjustments, repairs, and replacements were collected and analyzed for metal alloys, ceramics, and composites.\n \n \n \n Metal alloys exhibited slightly higher average numbers of adjustments compared to ceramics and composites. Ceramics required a higher mean number of repairs and replacements compared to other materials. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in adjustment frequency between metal alloys and ceramics (P = 0.047), but no significant differences were observed for repairs or replacements.\n \n \n \n The outcomes imply that material choice plays a significant role in the maintenance requirements of implant dental prostheses. While metal alloys may require more frequent adjustments, ceramics and composites may necessitate more repairs and replacements over time. Clinicians should consider these factors when selecting materials for implant prostheses and develop tailored maintenance protocols to optimize treatment outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_272_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Implant-supported prostheses have become a cornerstone of restorative dentistry, offering patients an effective solution for missing teeth. However, the choice of material for these prostheses can significantly impact their maintenance requirements and long-term success. Patient records of individuals who received implant-supported prostheses over a 2-year period were reviewed. Data on maintenance interventions, including adjustments, repairs, and replacements were collected and analyzed for metal alloys, ceramics, and composites. Metal alloys exhibited slightly higher average numbers of adjustments compared to ceramics and composites. Ceramics required a higher mean number of repairs and replacements compared to other materials. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in adjustment frequency between metal alloys and ceramics (P = 0.047), but no significant differences were observed for repairs or replacements. The outcomes imply that material choice plays a significant role in the maintenance requirements of implant dental prostheses. While metal alloys may require more frequent adjustments, ceramics and composites may necessitate more repairs and replacements over time. Clinicians should consider these factors when selecting materials for implant prostheses and develop tailored maintenance protocols to optimize treatment outcomes.
对用于牙科植入物修复的不同材料的评估:比较研究
摘要 种植体支持修复体已成为牙科修复的基石,为患者提供了有效的缺牙解决方案。然而,这些修复体的材料选择会极大地影响其维护要求和长期成功率。 我们回顾了两年内接受种植体支持修复体的患者记录。收集并分析了金属合金、陶瓷和复合材料的维护干预数据,包括调整、维修和更换。 与陶瓷和复合材料相比,金属合金的平均调整次数略高。与其他材料相比,陶瓷需要修理和更换的平均次数更高。统计分析显示,金属合金和陶瓷在调整次数上存在显著差异(P = 0.047),但在修复和更换方面没有观察到显著差异。 这些结果表明,材料的选择对种植义齿的维护要求起着重要作用。金属合金可能需要更频繁的调整,而陶瓷和复合材料随着时间的推移可能需要更多的维修和更换。临床医生在选择种植义齿材料时应考虑这些因素,并制定有针对性的维护方案,以优化治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信