Differences in the Effectiveness of Guidance and Attitudes towards Learning, Studying, and Academic Achievement According to the Guidance Method

Adel Mohamed El-Adl
{"title":"Differences in the Effectiveness of Guidance and Attitudes towards Learning, Studying, and Academic Achievement According to the Guidance Method","authors":"Adel Mohamed El-Adl","doi":"10.21608/psjer.2024.264887.1032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interactive academic advising means building an interactive electronic environment that achieves an effective advising system for moving from traditional advising to interactive electronic advising. The current study aims to verify the effectiveness of using electronic counseling platforms in achieving greater benefits from the counseling process among university students. The quasi-experimental approach was used on a sample of 82 university students. The experimental group (EG) consisted of 39 students to whom interactive academic electronic guidance was applied, while the control group (CG) consisted of 43 students to whom traditional face-to-face guidance was applied. In both groups, the students' socioeconomic status, intelligence, and previous academic achievements were approximately the same. The ages of the students in both groups ranged from 20 to 22 years. The Raven Matrix Scale, which consists of 60 matrices, was used to measure intelligence. A questionnaire on the extent of benefit from academic guidance, students’ attitudes towards study (prepared by the researcher), and obtaining the students’ cumulative average (GPA) in the end-of-term exam. The results of the study indicated that there are statistically significant differences between students in the experimental and control groups in the extent of benefit from academic guidance, students’ attitudes toward study, and students’ cumulative average (GPA) in favor of students who use interactive academic electronic guidance. The researcher recommended using interactive academic guidance in all universities; and training faculty members to use this type of guidance with all students .","PeriodicalId":212766,"journal":{"name":"Port Said Journal of Educational Research","volume":"82 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Port Said Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/psjer.2024.264887.1032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interactive academic advising means building an interactive electronic environment that achieves an effective advising system for moving from traditional advising to interactive electronic advising. The current study aims to verify the effectiveness of using electronic counseling platforms in achieving greater benefits from the counseling process among university students. The quasi-experimental approach was used on a sample of 82 university students. The experimental group (EG) consisted of 39 students to whom interactive academic electronic guidance was applied, while the control group (CG) consisted of 43 students to whom traditional face-to-face guidance was applied. In both groups, the students' socioeconomic status, intelligence, and previous academic achievements were approximately the same. The ages of the students in both groups ranged from 20 to 22 years. The Raven Matrix Scale, which consists of 60 matrices, was used to measure intelligence. A questionnaire on the extent of benefit from academic guidance, students’ attitudes towards study (prepared by the researcher), and obtaining the students’ cumulative average (GPA) in the end-of-term exam. The results of the study indicated that there are statistically significant differences between students in the experimental and control groups in the extent of benefit from academic guidance, students’ attitudes toward study, and students’ cumulative average (GPA) in favor of students who use interactive academic electronic guidance. The researcher recommended using interactive academic guidance in all universities; and training faculty members to use this type of guidance with all students .
不同指导方法下的指导效果和学习态度、学习和学业成绩的差异
互动式学业辅导是指建立互动式电子环境,实现从传统辅导到互动式电子辅导的有效辅导系统。本研究旨在验证电子辅导平台在大学生辅导过程中取得更大效益的有效性。本研究采用准实验方法,对 82 名大学生进行了抽样调查。实验组(EG)包括 39 名应用互动式学术电子指导的学生,对照组(CG)包括 43 名应用传统面对面指导的学生。两组学生的社会经济地位、智力和以往的学习成绩大致相同。两组学生的年龄在 20 至 22 岁之间。拉文矩阵量表由 60 个矩阵组成,用于测量智力。关于学业指导受益程度、学生学习态度的问卷(由研究者准备),并在期末考试中获得学生的累积平均分(GPA)。研究结果表明,实验组和对照组学生在学业指导受益程度、学生的学习态度和学生的累积平均分(GPA)方面存在统计学意义上的显著差异,使用交互式学业电子指导的学生更胜一筹。研究人员建议在所有大学使用互动式学业指导,并培训教师对所有学生使用这种指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信