Identity-Based Data Auditing Scheme With Provable Security in the Standard Model Suitable for Cloud Storage

IF 7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Lunzhi Deng, Shuai Feng, Tao Wang, Zhenyu Hu, S. Li
{"title":"Identity-Based Data Auditing Scheme With Provable Security in the Standard Model Suitable for Cloud Storage","authors":"Lunzhi Deng, Shuai Feng, Tao Wang, Zhenyu Hu, S. Li","doi":"10.1109/TDSC.2023.3336994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a data auditing scheme, the data owner authorizes a third-party auditor (TPA) to check whether the data stored in the cloud remains intact. Researchers have given many data auditing schemes. However, there are still three significant shortcomings in these schemes. First of all, the security proofs of these schemes are completed in the random oracle model (ROM). As we all know, a scheme with provably security in ROM may be insecure in practical applications. Second, TPA in most known schemes is set to be completely reliable. However, TPA in reality may attempt to extract the data owner's data. These schemes cannot resist the malicious behavior of TPA. Third, most known schemes require hash-to-point operations and enjoy high computation cost, so they are not suitable for computing-constrained environments. In this article, we first presented the system model and security demands for an identity-based data auditing (IBDA) scheme. We then came up with a new IBDA scheme and showed the security proofs in the standard model (SM). Finally, we made an analysis on performance for seven data auditing schemes. In our scheme, the computation cost required by TPA is a constant, independent of the number of data blocks participating in the challenge. Therefore, our scheme requires low computation cost and is suitable for computing-constrained environments.","PeriodicalId":13047,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3336994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a data auditing scheme, the data owner authorizes a third-party auditor (TPA) to check whether the data stored in the cloud remains intact. Researchers have given many data auditing schemes. However, there are still three significant shortcomings in these schemes. First of all, the security proofs of these schemes are completed in the random oracle model (ROM). As we all know, a scheme with provably security in ROM may be insecure in practical applications. Second, TPA in most known schemes is set to be completely reliable. However, TPA in reality may attempt to extract the data owner's data. These schemes cannot resist the malicious behavior of TPA. Third, most known schemes require hash-to-point operations and enjoy high computation cost, so they are not suitable for computing-constrained environments. In this article, we first presented the system model and security demands for an identity-based data auditing (IBDA) scheme. We then came up with a new IBDA scheme and showed the security proofs in the standard model (SM). Finally, we made an analysis on performance for seven data auditing schemes. In our scheme, the computation cost required by TPA is a constant, independent of the number of data blocks participating in the challenge. Therefore, our scheme requires low computation cost and is suitable for computing-constrained environments.
基于身份的数据审计方案,在标准模型中具有适用于云存储的可证明安全性
在数据审计方案中,数据所有者授权第三方审计员(TPA)检查存储在云中的数据是否完好无损。研究人员给出了许多数据审计方案。然而,这些方案仍存在三个重大缺陷。首先,这些方案的安全证明都是在随机甲骨文模型(ROM)中完成的。众所周知,在 ROM 中具有可证明安全性的方案在实际应用中可能并不安全。其次,大多数已知方案中的 TPA 都被设定为完全可靠。然而,现实中的 TPA 可能会试图提取数据所有者的数据。这些方案无法抵御 TPA 的恶意行为。第三,大多数已知方案需要哈希点到点操作,计算成本高,因此不适合计算受限的环境。在本文中,我们首先介绍了基于身份的数据审计(IBDA)方案的系统模型和安全需求。然后,我们提出了一种新的 IBDA 方案,并展示了标准模型(SM)中的安全证明。最后,我们分析了七种数据审计方案的性能。在我们的方案中,TPA 所需的计算成本是一个常数,与参与挑战的数据块数量无关。因此,我们的方案所需的计算成本较低,适用于计算受限的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The "IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (TDSC)" is a prestigious journal that publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research in the field of computer science, specifically targeting the development of dependable and secure computing systems and networks. This journal is dedicated to exploring the fundamental principles, methodologies, and mechanisms that enable the design, modeling, and evaluation of systems that meet the required levels of reliability, security, and performance. The scope of TDSC includes research on measurement, modeling, and simulation techniques that contribute to the understanding and improvement of system performance under various constraints. It also covers the foundations necessary for the joint evaluation, verification, and design of systems that balance performance, security, and dependability. By publishing archival research results, TDSC aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners working in the areas of cybersecurity, fault tolerance, and system reliability. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research ensures that it remains at the forefront of advancements in the field, promoting the development of technologies that are critical for the functioning of modern, complex systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信