The effectiveness of alluvial gully remediation in Great Barrier Reef catchments

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andrew P. Brooks , John Spencer , Nicholas J.C. Doriean , Robin Thwaites , James Daley , Tim Pietsch , Jorg Hacker , Justin Stout
{"title":"The effectiveness of alluvial gully remediation in Great Barrier Reef catchments","authors":"Andrew P. Brooks ,&nbsp;John Spencer ,&nbsp;Nicholas J.C. Doriean ,&nbsp;Robin Thwaites ,&nbsp;James Daley ,&nbsp;Tim Pietsch ,&nbsp;Jorg Hacker ,&nbsp;Justin Stout","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents data from a large-scale Before After Control Impact (BACI) design field experiment that measured the sediment reduction achieved by remediating large alluvial gullies. The study was carried out on Bonnie Doon Creek on the lower Burdekin River, in Queensland Australia. Prior to remediation, the four large alluvial gully complexes (active area of ∼17ha) were conservatively estimated to be delivering 5800 ± 1500 t of fine sediment (&lt;20 μm) per year (20 year average). The experiment demonstrated that the average remediation effectiveness across 10 different treatments was a 96%–99% reduction in fine sediment yield (or an annualised reduction of ∼5500t). High resolution lidar DEM of Difference (DoD) derived sediment yields in the unremediated gullies were found to be, on average, 58% lower than yields derived from monitored suspended sediment concentration (SSC) data, albeit with some uncertainty. These data support the notion that even high resolution (0.1m) lidar DoD yields are missing erosion driven by rainfall driven downwearing across all internal gully surfaces that is below the limit of detection (LOD) of the lidar. The results highlight that the greatest uncertainty in predicting the sediment abatement from gully remediation is associated with the determination of the baseline sediment yield of each gully. Future research effort should be focused on improving our understanding of baseline (multi-decadal) sediment yields, and monitored (annual) yields in different types of unremediated gullies. This is dependent on developing a detailed understanding of how these gullies evolve through time, and what the processes are that drive ongoing gully growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 102-121"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633924000510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents data from a large-scale Before After Control Impact (BACI) design field experiment that measured the sediment reduction achieved by remediating large alluvial gullies. The study was carried out on Bonnie Doon Creek on the lower Burdekin River, in Queensland Australia. Prior to remediation, the four large alluvial gully complexes (active area of ∼17ha) were conservatively estimated to be delivering 5800 ± 1500 t of fine sediment (<20 μm) per year (20 year average). The experiment demonstrated that the average remediation effectiveness across 10 different treatments was a 96%–99% reduction in fine sediment yield (or an annualised reduction of ∼5500t). High resolution lidar DEM of Difference (DoD) derived sediment yields in the unremediated gullies were found to be, on average, 58% lower than yields derived from monitored suspended sediment concentration (SSC) data, albeit with some uncertainty. These data support the notion that even high resolution (0.1m) lidar DoD yields are missing erosion driven by rainfall driven downwearing across all internal gully surfaces that is below the limit of detection (LOD) of the lidar. The results highlight that the greatest uncertainty in predicting the sediment abatement from gully remediation is associated with the determination of the baseline sediment yield of each gully. Future research effort should be focused on improving our understanding of baseline (multi-decadal) sediment yields, and monitored (annual) yields in different types of unremediated gullies. This is dependent on developing a detailed understanding of how these gullies evolve through time, and what the processes are that drive ongoing gully growth.
大堡礁集水区冲积沟壑整治的效果
本研究提供了大规模控制冲击前后(BACI)设计现场实验的数据,该实验测量了通过修复大型冲积沟渠实现的泥沙减少。这项研究是在澳大利亚昆士兰州伯德金河下游的邦妮·杜恩溪进行的。在进行修复之前,据保守估计,四个大型冲积沟复群(活动面积约17ha)每年(20年平均值)可输送5800±1500吨细沉积物(<20 μm)。实验表明,10种不同处理的平均修复效果是细沉积物产量减少96%-99%(或每年减少约5500t)。在未修复的沟渠中,高分辨率激光雷达差分DEM (DoD)得出的产沙量平均比监测悬浮泥沙浓度(SSC)数据得出的产沙量低58%,尽管存在一些不确定性。这些数据支持这样一种观点,即即使是高分辨率(0.1m)的激光雷达DoD也会忽略由降雨驱动的侵蚀,这些侵蚀会导致所有内部沟壑表面的磨损低于激光雷达的探测极限(LOD)。结果表明,在预测沟壑区修复泥沙减少量时,最大的不确定性与确定每个沟壑区的基线产沙量有关。未来的研究工作应该集中在提高我们对基线(多年代际)泥沙产量的理解,以及对不同类型未修复沟渠的监测(年)泥沙产量的理解。这取决于对这些沟壑是如何随时间演变的详细了解,以及驱动沟壑持续增长的过程是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信