Dysrhythmia as a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease: An app-based tapping test

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Dysrhythmia as a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease: An app-based tapping test","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Smartphone applications (apps) are instruments that assist with objective measurements during the clinical assessment of patients with movement disorders. We aim to test the hypothesis that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients will exhibit an increase in tapping variability and a decrease in tapping speed over a one-year period, compared to healthy controls (HC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data was prospectively collected from participants enrolled in our Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program, in 2021–2023. Participants diagnosed with PD and age-matched HC were examined over a one-year-interval with a tapping test performed with customized smartphone app. Tapping speed (taps/s), inter-tap intervals and variability (movement regularity), and sequence effect were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 295 PD patients and 62 HC. At baseline, PD subjects showed higher inter-tap variability than HC (coefficient-of-variation-CV, 37 ms [22–64] vs 26 ms [8–51]) (<em>p</em> = 0.007). Conversely, there was no difference in inter-tap intervals (411 ms [199–593] in PD versus 478 ms [243–618] in HC) and tapping speed (3.42[2.70–4.76] taps/s in PD versus 3.21 taps/s [2.57–4.54] in HC) (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Only PD subjects (<em>n</em> = 135), at the one-year follow-up, showed a decreased tapping speed vs baseline (3.44 taps/s [2.86–4.81] versus 3.39 taps/s [2.58,4.30]) (<em>p</em> = 0.036), without significant changes in inter-tap variability (CV, 32 ms [18,55] baseline versus 34 ms [22,59] follow-up) (<em>p</em> = 0.142). No changes were found in HC at the one-year follow up (all <em>p</em> values&gt;0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Inter-tap variability (dysrhythmia) but no inter-tap intervals or tapping speed are reliably distinctive feature of an app-based bradykinesia assessment in PD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X2400279X/pdfft?md5=470e029f72ca594ee1c22262ae218223&pid=1-s2.0-S0022510X2400279X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X2400279X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Smartphone applications (apps) are instruments that assist with objective measurements during the clinical assessment of patients with movement disorders. We aim to test the hypothesis that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients will exhibit an increase in tapping variability and a decrease in tapping speed over a one-year period, compared to healthy controls (HC).

Methods

Data was prospectively collected from participants enrolled in our Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program, in 2021–2023. Participants diagnosed with PD and age-matched HC were examined over a one-year-interval with a tapping test performed with customized smartphone app. Tapping speed (taps/s), inter-tap intervals and variability (movement regularity), and sequence effect were measured.

Results

We included 295 PD patients and 62 HC. At baseline, PD subjects showed higher inter-tap variability than HC (coefficient-of-variation-CV, 37 ms [22–64] vs 26 ms [8–51]) (p = 0.007). Conversely, there was no difference in inter-tap intervals (411 ms [199–593] in PD versus 478 ms [243–618] in HC) and tapping speed (3.42[2.70–4.76] taps/s in PD versus 3.21 taps/s [2.57–4.54] in HC) (p > 0.05). Only PD subjects (n = 135), at the one-year follow-up, showed a decreased tapping speed vs baseline (3.44 taps/s [2.86–4.81] versus 3.39 taps/s [2.58,4.30]) (p = 0.036), without significant changes in inter-tap variability (CV, 32 ms [18,55] baseline versus 34 ms [22,59] follow-up) (p = 0.142). No changes were found in HC at the one-year follow up (all p values>0.05).

Conclusions

Inter-tap variability (dysrhythmia) but no inter-tap intervals or tapping speed are reliably distinctive feature of an app-based bradykinesia assessment in PD.

心律失常是帕金森病的一个显著特征:基于应用程序的敲击测试
导言智能手机应用程序(App)是一种在运动障碍患者临床评估过程中辅助客观测量的工具。与健康对照组(HC)相比,帕金森病(PD)患者在一年时间内会表现出拍击变异性增加和拍击速度下降,我们旨在验证这一假设。诊断出患有帕金森氏症的参与者和年龄匹配的健康对照者在一年的时间内使用定制的智能手机应用程序进行拍击测试。结果我们纳入了295名帕金森病患者和62名白细胞减少症患者。基线时,帕金森病患者的拍击间变异性高于普通人(变异系数-CV,37 ms [22-64] vs 26 ms [8-51])(p = 0.007)。相反,拍击间隔(PD 为 411 毫秒 [199-593] 对 HC 为 478 毫秒 [243-618])和拍击速度(PD 为 3.42[2.70-4.76] 次/秒对 HC 为 3.21 次/秒 [2.57-4.54])没有差异(p >0.05)。只有帕金森病受试者(n = 135)在一年的随访中,敲击速度与基线相比有所下降(3.44 次/秒 [2.86-4.81] 对 3.39 次/秒 [2.58,4.30])(p = 0.036),但敲击间变异性(CV,32 毫秒 [18,55] 基线对 34 毫秒 [22,59] 随访)没有显著变化(p = 0.142)。结论轻拍间变异性(节律失调)而非轻拍间期或轻拍速度是基于应用程序的运动迟缓评估在帕金森病中的可靠特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信