Pulmonary vein stenosis following radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation: Presentation, diagnosis, and management using self-expandable, bare metal stents

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"Pulmonary vein stenosis following radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation: Presentation, diagnosis, and management using self-expandable, bare metal stents","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jccase.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a rare complication following PV isolation<span><span> (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. Despite the benefit of early intervention, screening is not conducted, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion. Standardized management approaches are unavailable for this serious complication. This report presents the case of a 56-year-old male with PV stenosis following PVI. During an annual follow up, the patient was asymptomatic, however a left </span>pleural effusion<span> was noted. Subsequent investigations, including a cardiac computed tomography (CT), confirmed the presence of left superior and inferior PV stenosis. </span></span></span>Balloon angioplasty (BA) of both PVs was performed, followed by stenting of the left inferior PV with a balloon-expandable bare metal stent (BMS). The stent slipped shortly after deployment requiring snaring and removal. </span><em>Re</em><span>-stenosis was confirmed on repeat CT and successful stenting with self-expandable BMSs was performed. Dual anti-platelet treatment was prescribed post-procedure, with lifelong single anti-platelet therapy after 3 months. Patent PVs with stents in-situ were noted on CT three months post-stenting. A recognized consensus among the literature favors stenting over BA, however, no prospective studies have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents versus BMSs, or balloon-expandable against self-expandable stents. Effective management requires a tailored, multidisciplinary approach.</span></div></div><div><h3>Learning objectives</h3><div>Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a rare complication of PV isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation with no guideline-directed treatment protocols. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for PV stenosis is essential to ensure timely intervention to improve lung perfusion and alleviate symptoms. Our case demonstrates the superiority of stenting over balloon angioplasty in maintaining PV patency following stenosis, as well as the successful application of self-expandable stents following slippage of a balloon-expandable stent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878540924000604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a rare complication following PV isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. Despite the benefit of early intervention, screening is not conducted, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion. Standardized management approaches are unavailable for this serious complication. This report presents the case of a 56-year-old male with PV stenosis following PVI. During an annual follow up, the patient was asymptomatic, however a left pleural effusion was noted. Subsequent investigations, including a cardiac computed tomography (CT), confirmed the presence of left superior and inferior PV stenosis. Balloon angioplasty (BA) of both PVs was performed, followed by stenting of the left inferior PV with a balloon-expandable bare metal stent (BMS). The stent slipped shortly after deployment requiring snaring and removal. Re-stenosis was confirmed on repeat CT and successful stenting with self-expandable BMSs was performed. Dual anti-platelet treatment was prescribed post-procedure, with lifelong single anti-platelet therapy after 3 months. Patent PVs with stents in-situ were noted on CT three months post-stenting. A recognized consensus among the literature favors stenting over BA, however, no prospective studies have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents versus BMSs, or balloon-expandable against self-expandable stents. Effective management requires a tailored, multidisciplinary approach.

Learning objectives

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a rare complication of PV isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation with no guideline-directed treatment protocols. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for PV stenosis is essential to ensure timely intervention to improve lung perfusion and alleviate symptoms. Our case demonstrates the superiority of stenting over balloon angioplasty in maintaining PV patency following stenosis, as well as the successful application of self-expandable stents following slippage of a balloon-expandable stent.
射频肺静脉隔离术后的肺静脉狭窄:表现、诊断和使用自膨胀裸金属支架的处理方法
肺静脉 (PV) 狭窄是心房颤动 PV 隔离术 (PVI) 后的一种罕见并发症。尽管早期干预有好处,但并没有进行筛查,这就强调了保持高度怀疑的重要性。目前还没有针对这种严重并发症的标准化处理方法。本报告介绍了一名 56 岁男性患者的病例,他在 PVI 术后出现了上腔静脉狭窄。在年度随访期间,患者无任何症状,但发现左侧胸腔积液。随后进行的检查,包括心脏计算机断层扫描(CT),证实存在左上和左下肺静脉狭窄。医生对两侧外上皮动脉进行了球囊血管成形术(BA),随后用球囊扩张裸金属支架(BMS)对左侧外下皮动脉进行了支架植入术。支架在植入后不久滑脱,需要取出。再次进行CT检查后确认支架再次狭窄,于是使用可自行膨胀的BMS成功进行了支架植入术。术后进行了双联抗血小板治疗,3 个月后进行了终身单联抗血小板治疗。支架植入术后三个月,CT 显示原位支架的 PV 通畅。文献中公认的共识是支架治疗优于血管造影术,但没有前瞻性研究证明药物洗脱支架优于 BMS,或球囊扩张支架优于自体扩张支架。学习目标肺静脉(PV)狭窄是心房颤动 PV 隔离消融术的罕见并发症,目前尚无指南指导的治疗方案。保持对肺静脉狭窄的高度怀疑是确保及时干预以改善肺灌注和缓解症状的关键。我们的病例表明,支架植入术比球囊血管成形术更能在血管狭窄后保持肺静脉通畅,而且在球囊扩张支架滑脱后还能成功应用自扩张支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiology Cases
Journal of Cardiology Cases Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信