N. Pathak, H. Guan, P. Fan, H. Sultana, K. Arriola, A. Oyebade, C. Nino de Guzman, M. Malekkhahi, K.C. Jeong, D. Vyas
{"title":"Comparing rumen fluid collection methods on fermentation profile and microbial population in lactating dairy cows","authors":"N. Pathak, H. Guan, P. Fan, H. Sultana, K. Arriola, A. Oyebade, C. Nino de Guzman, M. Malekkhahi, K.C. Jeong, D. Vyas","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to compare fermentation profile and microbial diversity from rumen samples collected using a rumen cannula (RC) or stomach tube (ST) in lactating dairy cows. Three ruminally cannulated lactating dairy cows were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. The experimental period was 28 d and rumen fluid was collected 4 h after feeding on d 22 and 26 of each experimental period. Treatments were rumen fluid collected from the ST or RC. The pH of rumen contents was measured immediately after fluid collection and samples were analyzed for VFA, ammonia-N (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) concentration, and microbiome composition. Rumen pH was greater for ST compared with RC (6.88 vs. 6.25). However, NH<sub>3</sub>-N (15.2 vs. 10.6 mg/dL) and total VFA (121.8 vs. 95.5 m<em>M</em>) were greater for RC compared with ST. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on the molar proportion of acetate and propionate; however, the acetate-to-propionate ratio tended to increase with ST compared with RC. The majority of sequences obtained with microbiome analysis belonged to <em>Bacteroidetes</em>, <em>Firmicutes</em>, and <em>Cyanobacteria</em>, regardless of the rumen fluid collection method. However, the abundance of <em>Bacteroidetes</em> was greater and the abundance of <em>Firmicutes</em> was lower for ST compared with RC. No effects were observed on the abundance of phylum <em>Cyanobacteria</em>. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on Chao1 and Shannon index. In conclusion, the molar proportion of individual VFA, Chao1, and Shannon index were similar, whereas rumen pH, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and total VFA were affected by the rumen fluid collection method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare fermentation profile and microbial diversity from rumen samples collected using a rumen cannula (RC) or stomach tube (ST) in lactating dairy cows. Three ruminally cannulated lactating dairy cows were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. The experimental period was 28 d and rumen fluid was collected 4 h after feeding on d 22 and 26 of each experimental period. Treatments were rumen fluid collected from the ST or RC. The pH of rumen contents was measured immediately after fluid collection and samples were analyzed for VFA, ammonia-N (NH3-N) concentration, and microbiome composition. Rumen pH was greater for ST compared with RC (6.88 vs. 6.25). However, NH3-N (15.2 vs. 10.6 mg/dL) and total VFA (121.8 vs. 95.5 mM) were greater for RC compared with ST. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on the molar proportion of acetate and propionate; however, the acetate-to-propionate ratio tended to increase with ST compared with RC. The majority of sequences obtained with microbiome analysis belonged to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Cyanobacteria, regardless of the rumen fluid collection method. However, the abundance of Bacteroidetes was greater and the abundance of Firmicutes was lower for ST compared with RC. No effects were observed on the abundance of phylum Cyanobacteria. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on Chao1 and Shannon index. In conclusion, the molar proportion of individual VFA, Chao1, and Shannon index were similar, whereas rumen pH, NH3-N, and total VFA were affected by the rumen fluid collection method.
本研究的目的是比较使用瘤胃插管(RC)和胃管(ST)采集的泌乳奶牛瘤胃样品的发酵特征和微生物多样性。选用3头瘤胃插管泌乳奶牛,采用3 × 3拉丁方设计。试验期28 d,于每期第22、26天饲喂后4 h采集瘤胃液。处理为从ST或RC收集瘤胃液。取液后立即测定瘤胃内容物pH,并对样品进行VFA、氨氮(NH3-N)浓度和微生物组组成分析。ST组瘤胃pH值高于RC组(6.88 vs 6.25)。然而,与st相比,RC的NH3-N (15.2 vs. 10.6 mg/dL)和总VFA (121.8 vs. 95.5 mM)更高。瘤胃液收集方法对乙酸和丙酸的摩尔比例没有影响;然而,与RC相比,与ST相比,乙酸与丙酸的比值有增加的趋势。无论采用何种瘤胃液采集方法,通过微生物组分析获得的大部分序列属于拟杆菌门、厚壁菌门和蓝藻门。然而,与RC相比,ST的拟杆菌门丰度更高,厚壁菌门丰度更低。没有观察到对蓝藻门丰度的影响。瘤胃液采集方式对Chao1和Shannon指数无明显影响。综上所述,瘤胃液收集方式影响瘤胃pH、NH3-N和总VFA,而个体VFA的摩尔比、Chao1和Shannon指数相似。