Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing

Louis Schiekiera, Jonathan Diederichs, Helen Niemeyer
{"title":"Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing","authors":"Louis Schiekiera, Jonathan Diederichs, Helen Niemeyer","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study addresses the gap in machine learning tools for positive results classification by evaluating the performance of SciBERT, a transformer model pretrained on scientific text, and random forest in clinical psychology abstracts. Over 1,900 abstracts were annotated into two categories: positive results only and mixed or negative results. Model performance was evaluated on three benchmarks. The best-performing model was utilized to analyze trends in over 20,000 psychotherapy study abstracts. SciBERT outperformed all benchmarks and random forest in in-domain and out-of-domain data. The trend analysis revealed nonsignificant effects of publication year on positive results for 1990–2005, but a significant decrease in positive results between 2005 and 2022. When examining the entire time span, significant positive linear and negative quadratic effects were observed. Machine learning could support future efforts to understand patterns of positive results in large data sets. The fine-tuned SciBERT model was deployed for public use.","PeriodicalId":263823,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","volume":"290 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: This study addresses the gap in machine learning tools for positive results classification by evaluating the performance of SciBERT, a transformer model pretrained on scientific text, and random forest in clinical psychology abstracts. Over 1,900 abstracts were annotated into two categories: positive results only and mixed or negative results. Model performance was evaluated on three benchmarks. The best-performing model was utilized to analyze trends in over 20,000 psychotherapy study abstracts. SciBERT outperformed all benchmarks and random forest in in-domain and out-of-domain data. The trend analysis revealed nonsignificant effects of publication year on positive results for 1990–2005, but a significant decrease in positive results between 2005 and 2022. When examining the entire time span, significant positive linear and negative quadratic effects were observed. Machine learning could support future efforts to understand patterns of positive results in large data sets. The fine-tuned SciBERT model was deployed for public use.
利用自然语言处理对临床心理学中的积极结果进行分类
摘要:本研究通过评估 SciBERT(一种在科学文本上经过预训练的转换器模型)和随机森林在临床心理学摘要中的表现,填补了用于正面结果分类的机器学习工具的空白。1,900 多篇摘要被注释为两类:仅正面结果和混合或负面结果。在三个基准上对模型性能进行了评估。表现最好的模型被用来分析 20,000 多份心理治疗研究摘要的趋势。在域内和域外数据中,SciBERT 的表现优于所有基准和随机森林。趋势分析显示,1990-2005 年间,发表年份对正面结果的影响并不显著,但 2005 至 2022 年间,正面结果显著减少。在研究整个时间跨度时,观察到了显著的正线性效应和负二次效应。机器学习可为今后了解大型数据集中的阳性结果模式提供支持。经过微调的 SciBERT 模型已部署供公众使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信