The effect of carbomer versus noncarbomer lubricant on the adequacy of cervical cytology specimens

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical cytology remains a critical screening tool for cervical cancer. While various factors can influence cytology quality, the effect of lubricant type used during specimen collection has been previously studied with inconclusive results. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical lubricant on cervical cytology results and elucidate risk factors associated with unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that switching from a carbomer-containing lubricant to a noncarbomer, water-soluble lubricant would improve specimen adequacy in cervical cytology.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review was performed examining patient cytologic results from January to December 2017 at a single academic institution. After historical rates of unsatisfactory cytology were higher than acceptable standards, the practice changed lubricant formulation from a carbomer containing lubricant to a noncarbomer, water soluble lubricant. Demographic data and treatment characteristics were collected for eligible patients. Matched analysis was performed to examine factors associated with an unsatisfactory cytology result.

Results

After the change in lubricant, there was a significant decline in the rates of unsatisfactory cytology from 9.6% to 5.7%, P = 0.01. This decline was also observed when patients were matched based on menopausal status, personal history of gynecologic malignancy, pregnancy status, and cytology specimen type (10.0% to 4.8%, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Change in lubricant from a carbomer containing to noncarbomer, water soluble product was associated with a statistically significant decline in the rates of unsatisfactory cytology. Although prior data have had mixed results as to the etiology of unsatisfactory cytology, we feel that this directly contributed to the high rates observed at our institution.