Archivage à enjeux élevés et relationnalité: conversations du Sex Work Activist Histories Project

Danielle Allard, Shawna Ferris, Amy Lebovich, Jenn Clamen, Micheline Hughes
{"title":"Archivage à enjeux élevés et relationnalité: conversations du Sex Work Activist Histories Project","authors":"Danielle Allard, Shawna Ferris, Amy Lebovich, Jenn Clamen, Micheline Hughes","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.17365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sex Work Activist Histories Project (SWAHP) is an interdisciplinary research and recordkeeping initiative to record and disseminate the radical knowledges, activist expertise, and important social movement histories created by activists connected to the Canadian sex worker rights movement. This paper explores how stakeholders of SWAHP work together ethically, and maintain good relations with each other when engaging in what we call high-stakes recordkeeping. Our discussions consider both the divergences or differences between academic and non-academic project partners, our convergence or common ground, and the bridges we have built between academic and non-academic concerns and practices to establish and develop methodologies and practices that inform SWAHP’s ongoing collaborations and sex-work activist histories, archives, and related activisms. We consider how to be mutually accountable to our varied and complex analytical and affective positionalities in the specific context of working ethically and relationally in high-stakes recordkeeping. We conclude by considering the relevance of these lessons to other contexts of community-led archiving and research. This paper is a lightly edited transcript of the speaker notes from a 2021 CAIS/ACSI (Allard, Ferris, Lebovitch, Clamen, and Hughes, 2021) panel presentation. Project partners are identified individually in their article sections to share, highlight, and preserve what is unique about each project partners’ perspective and voice, and to make explicit how we work together.","PeriodicalId":377680,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.17365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sex Work Activist Histories Project (SWAHP) is an interdisciplinary research and recordkeeping initiative to record and disseminate the radical knowledges, activist expertise, and important social movement histories created by activists connected to the Canadian sex worker rights movement. This paper explores how stakeholders of SWAHP work together ethically, and maintain good relations with each other when engaging in what we call high-stakes recordkeeping. Our discussions consider both the divergences or differences between academic and non-academic project partners, our convergence or common ground, and the bridges we have built between academic and non-academic concerns and practices to establish and develop methodologies and practices that inform SWAHP’s ongoing collaborations and sex-work activist histories, archives, and related activisms. We consider how to be mutually accountable to our varied and complex analytical and affective positionalities in the specific context of working ethically and relationally in high-stakes recordkeeping. We conclude by considering the relevance of these lessons to other contexts of community-led archiving and research. This paper is a lightly edited transcript of the speaker notes from a 2021 CAIS/ACSI (Allard, Ferris, Lebovitch, Clamen, and Hughes, 2021) panel presentation. Project partners are identified individually in their article sections to share, highlight, and preserve what is unique about each project partners’ perspective and voice, and to make explicit how we work together.
高风险存档和关系性:性工作积极分子历史项目的对话
性工作积极分子历史项目(SWAHP)是一项跨学科研究和记录计划,旨在记录和传播与加拿大性工作者权利运动有关的积极分子所创造的激进知识、积极分子的专业知识和重要的社会运动历史。本文探讨了 SWAHP 的利益相关者在从事我们所说的高风险记录工作时,如何以道德的方式合作并保持良好的关系。我们的讨论既考虑了学术界和非学术界项目合作伙伴之间的分歧或差异,也考虑了我们的交集或共同点,还考虑了我们在学术界和非学术界的关注点和实践之间架起的桥梁,以建立和发展方法论和实践,为 SWAHP 的持续合作以及性工作者活动史、档案和相关活动提供信息。我们考虑的是,在以道德和关系为基础的高风险记录工作的特定背景下,如何对我们不同的、复杂的分析和情感立场相互负责。最后,我们考虑了这些经验教训对其他社区主导的档案管理和研究工作的意义。本文是2021年CAIS/ACSI(Allard、Ferris、Lebovitch、Clamen和Hughes,2021年)小组讨论发言稿的简要编辑记录。本文在文章部分单独列出了项目合作伙伴,以分享、强调和保留每个项目合作伙伴的独特观点和声音,并明确说明我们是如何合作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信