Research-informed counselling and psychotherapy: A training and accreditation agenda

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mick Cooper, John McLeod, Kate Smith
{"title":"Research-informed counselling and psychotherapy: A training and accreditation agenda","authors":"Mick Cooper,&nbsp;John McLeod,&nbsp;Kate Smith","doi":"10.1002/capr.12799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Training and accreditation standards play a critical role in the development of a research-informed agenda. This commentary on Barkham et al. (<i>Counselling and Psychotherapy Research</i>, 2024) discusses obstacles to fully integrating research into the training and standard agendas, and the potential role that the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) can play in helping to overcome such obstacles. Knowledge of research evidence is currently limited in training and accreditation standards for counselling and psychotherapy, and course tutors are often not familiar—or engaged—with research findings. In the development of professional standards (for instance, within SCoPEd), the BACP should work to ensure that research competencies are comprehensive, contemporary and explained in a granular manner. Further helpful developments might include an annual research-oriented conference for trainers and clinical supervisors, a journal dedicated to disseminating research and good practice in training and clinical supervision and/or a training/clinical supervision research network to coordinate activities in these area. BACP events—across all elements of the profession—should strive to address issues of research awareness and participation, and the use of research to inform practice. Critically, across all of these possibilities, BACP's Research Department, alone, cannot be left to support moves to a research-informed profession. Rather, an organisation-wide initiative is needed in which appreciation of the research evidence is at the heart of all aspects of the Association's work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12799","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Training and accreditation standards play a critical role in the development of a research-informed agenda. This commentary on Barkham et al. (Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2024) discusses obstacles to fully integrating research into the training and standard agendas, and the potential role that the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) can play in helping to overcome such obstacles. Knowledge of research evidence is currently limited in training and accreditation standards for counselling and psychotherapy, and course tutors are often not familiar—or engaged—with research findings. In the development of professional standards (for instance, within SCoPEd), the BACP should work to ensure that research competencies are comprehensive, contemporary and explained in a granular manner. Further helpful developments might include an annual research-oriented conference for trainers and clinical supervisors, a journal dedicated to disseminating research and good practice in training and clinical supervision and/or a training/clinical supervision research network to coordinate activities in these area. BACP events—across all elements of the profession—should strive to address issues of research awareness and participation, and the use of research to inform practice. Critically, across all of these possibilities, BACP's Research Department, alone, cannot be left to support moves to a research-informed profession. Rather, an organisation-wide initiative is needed in which appreciation of the research evidence is at the heart of all aspects of the Association's work.

以研究为基础的咨询和心理治疗:培训和认证议程
培训和认证标准在制定以研究为基础的议程方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这篇对 Barkham 等人(《咨询与心理治疗研究》,2024 年)的评论讨论了将研究充分纳入培训和标准议程的障碍,以及英国咨询与心理治疗协会(BACP)在帮助克服这些障碍方面可能发挥的作用。目前,在咨询与心理治疗的培训和认证标准中,对研究证据的了解十分有限,课程导师往往不熟悉或不参与研究成果。在制定专业标准时(例如,在 SCoPEd 范围内),英国心理咨询与治疗师协会应努力确保研究能力是全面的、现代的,并以细化的方式加以解释。其他有益的发展可能包括:为培训师和临床督导人员举办以研究为导向的年度会议,出版一份专门传播培训和临床督导方面的研究和良好实践的期刊,以及/或建立一个培训/临床督导研究网络,以协调这些领域的活动。BACP 的各项活动--涉及该行业的所有要素--应努力解决研究意识和参与问题,并利用研究为实践提供信息。重要的是,在所有这些可能性中,BACP 的研究部门不能独自支持向研究型专业发展。相反,需要在整个组织范围内采取主动行动,将对研究证据的重视作为协会各方面工作的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信