The effect of the implementation of the Learning Start with a Question (LSQ) learning strategy on the learning outcomes of economics students in class X at MA Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru

Asri Neli Putri, Paijan Rambe, S. Suparmi, Sukma Setia Ningsih, Syahrul Amin
{"title":"The effect of the implementation of the Learning Start with a Question (LSQ) learning strategy on the learning outcomes of economics students in class X at MA Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru","authors":"Asri Neli Putri, Paijan Rambe, S. Suparmi, Sukma Setia Ningsih, Syahrul Amin","doi":"10.55210/attalim.v10i2.1699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out whether there is a difference in learning outcomes after applying the Learning Start With A Question (LSQ) learning strategy to student learning outcomes in financial institutions (banks) in Economics in class X MA Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru. The subjects in the study were 33 students. Data collection was carried out from posttest questions given to students in the control class and experimental class. The learning outcomes obtained when conducting research were an average score of 71.76, while for the experimental class the average score was 76.25. Thus, the average score obtained from the experimental class that was treated in the form of LSQ strategy was higher than that of the control class that was not treated. In the normality test, the data obtained was not normal, so the researcher processed the data using a non-parametric test obtained the hypothesis that the processed value was 0.601>0.05, indicating that Ha was rejected and H0 was accepted. This means that there is no significant average difference between the use of LSQ and conventional learning strategies.","PeriodicalId":408334,"journal":{"name":"At- Ta'lim : Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"26 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"At- Ta'lim : Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55210/attalim.v10i2.1699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find out whether there is a difference in learning outcomes after applying the Learning Start With A Question (LSQ) learning strategy to student learning outcomes in financial institutions (banks) in Economics in class X MA Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru. The subjects in the study were 33 students. Data collection was carried out from posttest questions given to students in the control class and experimental class. The learning outcomes obtained when conducting research were an average score of 71.76, while for the experimental class the average score was 76.25. Thus, the average score obtained from the experimental class that was treated in the form of LSQ strategy was higher than that of the control class that was not treated. In the normality test, the data obtained was not normal, so the researcher processed the data using a non-parametric test obtained the hypothesis that the processed value was 0.601>0.05, indicating that Ha was rejected and H0 was accepted. This means that there is no significant average difference between the use of LSQ and conventional learning strategies.
实施 "从问题开始学习"(LSQ)学习策略对北干巴鲁玛哈默迪雅大学经济学十班学生学习成果的影响
本研究旨在了解在北干巴鲁州立大学经济学第十班的金融机构(银行)课程中应用 "从问题开始学习"(LSQ)学习策略后,学生的学习成果是否存在差异。研究对象为 33 名学生。数据收集是通过对对照班和实验班学生的后测试题进行的。研究得出的学习成果平均分为 71.76 分,而实验班的平均分为 76.25 分。因此,采用 LSQ 策略的实验班的平均得分高于未采用 LSQ 策略的对照班。在正态性检验中,得到的数据不符合正态性,因此研究人员使用非参数检验对数据进行了处理,得到的假设处理值为 0.601>0.05,表明拒绝了 Ha,接受了 H0。这说明使用 LSQ 和传统学习策略之间没有明显的平均差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信