Did the increase in birth grants result in higher births? Evidence from the Czech demographic and population policy change

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ondrˇej Dvouletý
{"title":"Did the increase in birth grants result in higher births? Evidence from the Czech demographic and population policy change","authors":"Ondrˇej Dvouletý","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-04-2024-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research contributes to a better understanding of the effects of public demographic and population policy. The study investigates whether a considerable increase in birth grants in 2006 in the Czech Republic resulted in a higher number of births.Design/methodology/approachTo quantify the effects, we work with the administrative, statistical daily data (1993–2016) on the number of births and use time series analysis tools. In particular, we estimate a time series regression model via the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique with robust standard errors, testing placebo effects and the differences between the trend-forecasted values in the absence of the grant change.FindingsOur results, spread over several time windows covering up to a ten-year period after the intervention, show that the intervention significantly and positively affected the number of births in the post-intervention periods. The evidence obtained from the econometric analysis of the time series clearly shows that after the demographic and population policy change, there was an average increase of 17–19 births daily when the data was analysed up to 2016. Therefore, the conclusion is that the policy intervention led to expected and desired policy outcomes.Originality/valueThe study provides the stakeholders and policymakers with an experience of the public policy aiming to support fertility, which has reached its expectations.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-04-2024-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research contributes to a better understanding of the effects of public demographic and population policy. The study investigates whether a considerable increase in birth grants in 2006 in the Czech Republic resulted in a higher number of births.Design/methodology/approachTo quantify the effects, we work with the administrative, statistical daily data (1993–2016) on the number of births and use time series analysis tools. In particular, we estimate a time series regression model via the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique with robust standard errors, testing placebo effects and the differences between the trend-forecasted values in the absence of the grant change.FindingsOur results, spread over several time windows covering up to a ten-year period after the intervention, show that the intervention significantly and positively affected the number of births in the post-intervention periods. The evidence obtained from the econometric analysis of the time series clearly shows that after the demographic and population policy change, there was an average increase of 17–19 births daily when the data was analysed up to 2016. Therefore, the conclusion is that the policy intervention led to expected and desired policy outcomes.Originality/valueThe study provides the stakeholders and policymakers with an experience of the public policy aiming to support fertility, which has reached its expectations.
生育补助金的增加是否导致了更高的出生率?捷克人口和人口政策变化的证据
目的本研究有助于更好地了解公共人口政策的效果。为了量化效果,我们使用了关于出生人数的每日行政统计数据(1993-2016 年),并使用了时间序列分析工具。特别是,我们通过普通最小二乘法(OLS)技术估算了一个时间序列回归模型,该模型具有稳健的标准误差,检验了安慰剂效应以及在没有补助金变化的情况下趋势预测值之间的差异。研究结果我们在干预后长达十年的几个时间窗口中得出的结果显示,干预对干预后时期的出生人数产生了显著的积极影响。对时间序列进行计量经济学分析所获得的证据清楚地表明,在人口和人口政策发生变化后,对截至 2016 年的数据进行分析时,平均每天的出生人数增加了 17-19 人。因此,结论是政策干预取得了预期和理想的政策成果。原创性/价值本研究为利益相关者和决策者提供了旨在支持生育的公共政策的经验,该政策已达到预期目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信