Between evidence and delusion – a scoping review of cognitive biases in Environmental and Sustainability Education

Pascal Frank, Gianna Henkel, J. Lysgaard
{"title":"Between evidence and delusion – a scoping review of cognitive biases in Environmental and Sustainability Education","authors":"Pascal Frank, Gianna Henkel, J. Lysgaard","doi":"10.1080/13504622.2024.2371507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exposing learners to sustainability-related topics can present affective– motivational challenges for learners, which may prompt cognitive bias. Cognitive bias directly influences how individuals perceive and process sustainability-related information, thereby also influencing sustainability-related behaviour and decision-making. Therefore, cognitive bias may also present a significant obstacle to the purposes of Environmental and Sustainability Education. Notwithstanding its potential relevance, there is no comprehensive understanding of how cognitive bias is currently addressed in Environmental and Sustainability Education. This review scopes scientific literature that addresses cognitive bias in Environmental and Sustainability education, based on SCOPUS, Web of Science and ERIC. We identified 21 articles that matched our search criteria. We identified four superordinate categories of cognitive bias that were addressed in the literature, including bounded rationality, confirmation bias, self-enhancement and ambiguity aversion. Moreover, we distinguished three perspectives from which cognitive bias is discussed in the literature: (i) education to mitigate bias associated with sustainability-related matters, (ii) bias as a barrier to Environmental and Sustainability Education and (iii) bias at the research-paradigm level. The list of identified biases provides evidence that cognitive bias may play an important role in Environmental and Sustainability Education scholarship and practices, which suggests that more research on this topic is needed.","PeriodicalId":504518,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Education Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2371507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposing learners to sustainability-related topics can present affective– motivational challenges for learners, which may prompt cognitive bias. Cognitive bias directly influences how individuals perceive and process sustainability-related information, thereby also influencing sustainability-related behaviour and decision-making. Therefore, cognitive bias may also present a significant obstacle to the purposes of Environmental and Sustainability Education. Notwithstanding its potential relevance, there is no comprehensive understanding of how cognitive bias is currently addressed in Environmental and Sustainability Education. This review scopes scientific literature that addresses cognitive bias in Environmental and Sustainability education, based on SCOPUS, Web of Science and ERIC. We identified 21 articles that matched our search criteria. We identified four superordinate categories of cognitive bias that were addressed in the literature, including bounded rationality, confirmation bias, self-enhancement and ambiguity aversion. Moreover, we distinguished three perspectives from which cognitive bias is discussed in the literature: (i) education to mitigate bias associated with sustainability-related matters, (ii) bias as a barrier to Environmental and Sustainability Education and (iii) bias at the research-paradigm level. The list of identified biases provides evidence that cognitive bias may play an important role in Environmental and Sustainability Education scholarship and practices, which suggests that more research on this topic is needed.
在证据与妄想之间--对环境与可持续发展教育中认知偏差的范围界定审查
让学习者接触与可持续发展相关的话题,可能会给学习者带来情感和动机方面的挑战,这可能会引发认知偏差。认知偏差直接影响个人如何感知和处理与可持续性相关的信息,从而也影响与可持续性相关的行为和决策。因此,认知偏差也可能成为实现环境与可持续发展教育目标的重大障碍。尽管认知偏差具有潜在的相关性,但目前在环境与可持续发展教育中如何解决认知偏差问题还没有全面的认识。本综述以 SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 ERIC 为基础,对解决环境与可持续发展教育中认知偏差问题的科学文献进行了研究。我们确定了 21 篇符合搜索标准的文章。我们确定了文献中涉及的认知偏差的四个上位类别,包括有界理性、确认偏差、自我强化和模糊厌恶。此外,我们还区分了文献中讨论认知偏差的三个视角:(i) 教育以减轻与可持续发展相关的偏差,(ii) 偏差是环境与可持续发展教育的障碍,(iii) 研究范式层面的偏差。已确定的偏见清单提供了证据,表明认知偏见可能在环境与可持续发展教育学术和实践中发挥重要作用,这表明需要对这一主题进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信