Development of antibacterial drug + bacteriophage combination assays

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
M. Attwood, Pippa Griffins, Alan Noel, Theo Josephs, Karen Adler, Martha Clokie, A. MacGowan
{"title":"Development of antibacterial drug + bacteriophage combination assays","authors":"M. Attwood, Pippa Griffins, Alan Noel, Theo Josephs, Karen Adler, Martha Clokie, A. MacGowan","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The best methods to study the interactions between phages and antibacterials are unclear. As laboratory methodologies used to assess conventional antibacterials are established, we assessed their ability to evaluate phage plus antibacterial.\n \n \n \n The efficacy of three characterized Escherichia coli phages (UP17, JK08, 113) were tested on a 100 MDR E coli. strains. The phages were assessed individually and in a 1:1:1 cocktail. In a phage microbial inhibitory concentration (PmIC) assay, a range of phage concentrations from 101 to 108 were inoculated with 5 × 105 bacteria/well in 96-well microtitre plates. The first fully lysed well was taken as the PmIC. Amikacin and meropenem MICs were determined by ISO 2776-1:2019 methods alone and in combination with a fixed phage concentration of 105/per well. Time–kill curves (TKCs) were conducted at fosfomycin concentrations of 133, 50 and 5 mg/L, with and without phage.\n \n \n \n The PmIC50/90 values, in plaque-forming units (pfu)/mL, for individual phage titre were >108/>108 for UP17, 107/>108 for JK08, 107/>108 for 113 and 106/>108 for the 1:1:1 phage cocktail, all with a standard deviation (SD) of <0.05. Amikacin and meropenem MIC50/90 (SD) values were 2/8 mg/L (<0.05–9.2) and 0.12/8 mg/L (<0.05–8.7), respectively. The addition of UP17 to amikacin increased amikacin MICs >2-fold in 78 strains, with equivalent trends in 39 strains with JK08, 54 strains with 113 and 45 strains with phage cocktail. Meropenem MICs in the presence of phage were reduced >2-fold in 24 strains with UP17. Equivalent decreases were seen with 34 strains with JK08, 26 strains with 113 and 29 strains with the cocktail. In TKCs, the addition of phage suppressed regrowth.\n \n \n \n Microbroth methodologies based on ISO 2776-1:2019 lend themselves to be viable options for phage assessment, alone or in combination with antibiotics. The reproducibility of PmIC and familiarity of the methodology described allows for laboratory validation for phage and antibiotic combinations.\n","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The best methods to study the interactions between phages and antibacterials are unclear. As laboratory methodologies used to assess conventional antibacterials are established, we assessed their ability to evaluate phage plus antibacterial. The efficacy of three characterized Escherichia coli phages (UP17, JK08, 113) were tested on a 100 MDR E coli. strains. The phages were assessed individually and in a 1:1:1 cocktail. In a phage microbial inhibitory concentration (PmIC) assay, a range of phage concentrations from 101 to 108 were inoculated with 5 × 105 bacteria/well in 96-well microtitre plates. The first fully lysed well was taken as the PmIC. Amikacin and meropenem MICs were determined by ISO 2776-1:2019 methods alone and in combination with a fixed phage concentration of 105/per well. Time–kill curves (TKCs) were conducted at fosfomycin concentrations of 133, 50 and 5 mg/L, with and without phage. The PmIC50/90 values, in plaque-forming units (pfu)/mL, for individual phage titre were >108/>108 for UP17, 107/>108 for JK08, 107/>108 for 113 and 106/>108 for the 1:1:1 phage cocktail, all with a standard deviation (SD) of <0.05. Amikacin and meropenem MIC50/90 (SD) values were 2/8 mg/L (<0.05–9.2) and 0.12/8 mg/L (<0.05–8.7), respectively. The addition of UP17 to amikacin increased amikacin MICs >2-fold in 78 strains, with equivalent trends in 39 strains with JK08, 54 strains with 113 and 45 strains with phage cocktail. Meropenem MICs in the presence of phage were reduced >2-fold in 24 strains with UP17. Equivalent decreases were seen with 34 strains with JK08, 26 strains with 113 and 29 strains with the cocktail. In TKCs, the addition of phage suppressed regrowth. Microbroth methodologies based on ISO 2776-1:2019 lend themselves to be viable options for phage assessment, alone or in combination with antibiotics. The reproducibility of PmIC and familiarity of the methodology described allows for laboratory validation for phage and antibiotic combinations.
开发抗菌药物+噬菌体组合试验
研究噬菌体与抗菌药之间相互作用的最佳方法尚不明确。由于用于评估传统抗菌药的实验室方法已经确立,我们评估了这些方法评估噬菌体加抗菌药的能力。 我们在 100 株 MDR 大肠杆菌菌株上测试了三种特征性大肠杆菌噬菌体(UP17、JK08、113)的功效。这些噬菌体分别以 1:1:1 鸡尾酒的形式进行了评估。在噬菌体微生物抑制浓度(PmIC)试验中,在 96 孔微滴定板中每孔接种 5 × 105 个细菌,噬菌体浓度范围为 101 至 108。以第一个完全裂解的孔为 PmIC。阿米卡星和美罗培南的 MIC 值按 ISO 2776-1:2019 方法单独或与每孔 105 个的固定噬菌体浓度结合测定。在磷霉素浓度为 133、50 和 5 毫克/升时,有噬菌体和无噬菌体的情况下,进行了时间杀伤曲线(TKC)测定。 以斑形成单位(pfu)/毫升为单位,单个噬菌体滴度的 PmIC50/90 值分别为:UP17 >108/>108、JK08 107/>108、113 107/>108、1:1:1 鸡尾酒噬菌体 106/>108,78 株菌株的标准偏差(SD)均为 2 倍,JK08 的 39 株菌株、113 的 54 株菌株和鸡尾酒噬菌体的 45 株菌株的趋势相当。使用 UP17 的 24 株菌株在噬菌体存在下的美罗培南 MIC 降低了 2 倍以上。使用 JK08 的 34 株菌株、使用 113 的 26 株菌株和使用鸡尾酒的 29 株菌株的 MIC 值也出现了同等程度的降低。在 TKC 中,添加噬菌体可抑制再生。 以 ISO 2776-1:2019 为基础的微流方法是噬菌体单独或与抗生素结合进行评估的可行选择。PmIC 的可重复性和所描述方法的熟悉性使得噬菌体与抗生素组合的实验室验证成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信