Leadership during crisis: a multi-sector exploration of perceptions of leadership in Australia

A. Samad, M. Muchiri
{"title":"Leadership during crisis: a multi-sector exploration of perceptions of leadership in Australia","authors":"A. Samad, M. Muchiri","doi":"10.1108/bl-05-2023-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to extend our understanding of the concept of crisis leadership based on perceptions of 48 Australian leaders drawn from various sectors including Australian politics, higher education, not-for-profit and corporate sectors.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis qualitative study employed semi-structured virtual interviews of 48 leaders from Australian politics, higher education, not-for-profit and corporate sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Leximancer text analytics program was used for data analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nParticipants perceived effective leadership during a crisis as encompassing four macro themes: leadership as power, leadership as emanating from people, leadership as management and leadership as specific to the organization. While these findings reinforced extant literature on facets of effective leadership, leaders from different sectors differed on the relative importance of some leadership themes and their relevance to specific sectors.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWhile the data were collected from a convenient sample, our findings from multiple sectors in Australia extend our knowledge on crisis leadership by revealing differences in sectorial perspectives of crisis leadership. Further, these findings help refine the extant traditional explanations of leadership and especially offer an enhanced understanding of leadership during a crisis. Consequently, our findings support future research that could help identify specific attributes of leaders navigating organizational crises. Such future research could subsequently help develop a theory on crisis leadership based on a valid and reliable measurement for assessing crisis leadership effectiveness in diverse organizational settings.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOur study is based on multi-sector data and consequently lays a solid foundation for extending the conceptualization of leadership during crisis, and the need to reconceptualize effective leader attributes useful in crisis contexts. Theoretically, the current study extended recent research on crisis leadership, by examining the conceptualizations of crisis leadership within specific Australian sectors.\n","PeriodicalId":293295,"journal":{"name":"The Bottom Line","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-05-2023-0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to extend our understanding of the concept of crisis leadership based on perceptions of 48 Australian leaders drawn from various sectors including Australian politics, higher education, not-for-profit and corporate sectors. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study employed semi-structured virtual interviews of 48 leaders from Australian politics, higher education, not-for-profit and corporate sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Leximancer text analytics program was used for data analysis. Findings Participants perceived effective leadership during a crisis as encompassing four macro themes: leadership as power, leadership as emanating from people, leadership as management and leadership as specific to the organization. While these findings reinforced extant literature on facets of effective leadership, leaders from different sectors differed on the relative importance of some leadership themes and their relevance to specific sectors. Research limitations/implications While the data were collected from a convenient sample, our findings from multiple sectors in Australia extend our knowledge on crisis leadership by revealing differences in sectorial perspectives of crisis leadership. Further, these findings help refine the extant traditional explanations of leadership and especially offer an enhanced understanding of leadership during a crisis. Consequently, our findings support future research that could help identify specific attributes of leaders navigating organizational crises. Such future research could subsequently help develop a theory on crisis leadership based on a valid and reliable measurement for assessing crisis leadership effectiveness in diverse organizational settings. Originality/value Our study is based on multi-sector data and consequently lays a solid foundation for extending the conceptualization of leadership during crisis, and the need to reconceptualize effective leader attributes useful in crisis contexts. Theoretically, the current study extended recent research on crisis leadership, by examining the conceptualizations of crisis leadership within specific Australian sectors.
危机中的领导力:对澳大利亚领导力认知的多部门探索
目的 本文旨在根据来自澳大利亚政界、高等教育界、非营利组织和企业界等不同领域的 48 位澳大利亚领导人的看法,扩展我们对危机领导力概念的理解。设计/方法/方法这项定性研究在 COVID-19 大流行期间对来自澳大利亚政界、高等教育界、非营利组织和企业界的 48 位领导人进行了半结构化虚拟访谈。研究结果参与者认为危机期间的有效领导力包含四个宏观主题:作为权力的领导力、源于人的领导力、作为管理的领导力和组织特有的领导力。虽然这些研究结果加强了有关有效领导力各个方面的现有文献,但来自不同部门的领导者对某些领导力主题的相对重要性及其与特定部门的相关性存在分歧。研究局限/意义虽然数据是从一个方便的样本中收集的,但我们从澳大利亚多个部门收集的研究结果揭示了各部门对危机领导力看法的差异,从而扩展了我们对危机领导力的认识。此外,这些发现有助于完善现有的传统领导力解释,特别是加深了对危机期间领导力的理解。因此,我们的研究结果为未来的研究提供了支持,有助于确定领导者在组织危机中的具体特质。我们的研究以多部门数据为基础,因此为扩展危机期间领导力的概念化奠定了坚实的基础,也为重新认识危机背景下有效领导者特质的必要性奠定了坚实的基础。从理论上讲,本研究通过考察澳大利亚特定行业的危机领导力概念,扩展了近期有关危机领导力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信