Assessing The Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating of Adenocarcinoma Endometrial Cancer

Dr. Kumud Kumari, Dr. Nidhi Jha, D. S, Dr. John Abraham, Dr. Ramesh Vasudevan, Srilakshmi C
{"title":"Assessing The Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating of Adenocarcinoma Endometrial Cancer","authors":"Dr. Kumud Kumari, Dr. Nidhi Jha, D. S, Dr. John Abraham, Dr. Ramesh Vasudevan, Srilakshmi C","doi":"10.22376/ijtos.2024.2.3.1-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a growing preference for laparoscopic surgery. Insufficient data exists on the safety of laparoscopy in endometrial cancer. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the perioperative and oncologic results of laparoscopic and laparotomic. staging surgery in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in this specific patient group. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 250 patients who had surgical staging for adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer at the gynecologic oncology department of a government hospital from 2018 to 2023. A comparison was made between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of demographic, histopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic parameters. An additional assessment was conducted on a subset of individuals who had a body mass index greater than 30. The demographic and histopathologic parameters of the two groups were comparable, however laparoscopic surgery demonstrated a much higher level of effectiveness in terms of perioperative outcomes. The laparotomy group had a much greater number of excised and metastatic lymph nodes. However, this difference did not have an impact on the oncologic outcomes, such as recurrence and survival rates. Both groups had similar results in this regard. The results of the subgroup with a BMI more than 30 were consistent with those of the entire population. The intraoperative problems encountered during the laparoscopic procedure were effectively resolved. Laparoscopic surgery is considered superior to laparotomy and, depending on the surgeon's expertise, it can be safely used for surgical staging of adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer.","PeriodicalId":479912,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trends in OncoScience","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trends in OncoScience","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22376/ijtos.2024.2.3.1-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing preference for laparoscopic surgery. Insufficient data exists on the safety of laparoscopy in endometrial cancer. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the perioperative and oncologic results of laparoscopic and laparotomic. staging surgery in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in this specific patient group. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 250 patients who had surgical staging for adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer at the gynecologic oncology department of a government hospital from 2018 to 2023. A comparison was made between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of demographic, histopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic parameters. An additional assessment was conducted on a subset of individuals who had a body mass index greater than 30. The demographic and histopathologic parameters of the two groups were comparable, however laparoscopic surgery demonstrated a much higher level of effectiveness in terms of perioperative outcomes. The laparotomy group had a much greater number of excised and metastatic lymph nodes. However, this difference did not have an impact on the oncologic outcomes, such as recurrence and survival rates. Both groups had similar results in this regard. The results of the subgroup with a BMI more than 30 were consistent with those of the entire population. The intraoperative problems encountered during the laparoscopic procedure were effectively resolved. Laparoscopic surgery is considered superior to laparotomy and, depending on the surgeon's expertise, it can be safely used for surgical staging of adenocarcinoma endometrial cancer.
评估腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜腺癌的安全性
近年来,腹腔镜手术越来越受到青睐。关于子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术安全性的数据不足。本研究的目的是评估和比较腹腔镜手术和腹腔镜手术对确诊为腺癌子宫内膜癌患者的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。该研究旨在评估腹腔镜手术在这一特殊患者群体中的安全性和有效性。研究人员对2018年至2023年在一家政府医院妇科肿瘤科进行腺癌子宫内膜癌手术分期的250名患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。在人口统计学、组织病理学、围手术期和肿瘤学参数方面,对腹腔镜组和开腹手术组进行了比较。另外,还对体重指数大于 30 的人群进行了评估。两组的人口统计学和组织病理学参数相当,但腹腔镜手术在围手术期结果方面的有效性要高得多。腹腔镜手术组切除和转移淋巴结的数量要多得多。不过,这一差异对复发率和存活率等肿瘤学结果并无影响。两组在这方面的结果相似。体重指数(BMI)大于 30 的亚组的结果与整个人群的结果一致。腹腔镜手术中遇到的术中问题都得到了有效解决。腹腔镜手术被认为优于开腹手术,根据外科医生的专业知识,腹腔镜手术可以安全地用于腺癌子宫内膜癌的手术分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信