Assessing the Potential of Bio-Based Friction Modifiers for Food-Grade Lubrication

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Rosa Maria Nothnagel, G. Boidi, Rainer Franz, M. Frauscher
{"title":"Assessing the Potential of Bio-Based Friction Modifiers for Food-Grade Lubrication","authors":"Rosa Maria Nothnagel, G. Boidi, Rainer Franz, M. Frauscher","doi":"10.3390/lubricants12070247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to identify a bio-based friction modifier (FM) with tribological performance comparable to conventional FMs. Promising alternatives to conventional FMs, such as the FMs derived from natural sources, including rapeseed and salmon oil, were selected. Increasing concerns about crude oil prices, environmental impact, and the depletion of fossil resources have further fueled the search for renewable, biodegradable, and environmentally friendly raw materials for lubricants Tribological tests were conducted using a rheometer under non-conformal contact. The normal force, temperature, and sliding speed were varied to simulate conditions such as those found in a food extruder. To simulate cold extrusion applications, water and bio-based FM mixtures were used. The best-performing bio-based FMs were then mixed with a polyalphaolefin to simulate warm extrusion conditions. The results were compared to those obtained from mixtures of a polyalphaolefin and selected conventional FMs. The main finding of this study demonstrated that rapeseed and salmon oils, with a peak coefficient of friction (COF) of 0.16, are the best-performing bio-based FMs for reducing friction. When mixed with distilled water for cold extrusion (case 1) and with polyalphaolefin for warm extrusion (case 2), they performed similarly to the conventional FM, tallow amine, also with a maximum COF of 0.16, and significantly better than polyalphaolefin alone (maximum COF of 0.25). Consequently, rapeseed and salmon oils are suitable bio-based FM candidates to replace conventional FMs in food-grade lubrication.","PeriodicalId":18135,"journal":{"name":"Lubricants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lubricants","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12070247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research is to identify a bio-based friction modifier (FM) with tribological performance comparable to conventional FMs. Promising alternatives to conventional FMs, such as the FMs derived from natural sources, including rapeseed and salmon oil, were selected. Increasing concerns about crude oil prices, environmental impact, and the depletion of fossil resources have further fueled the search for renewable, biodegradable, and environmentally friendly raw materials for lubricants Tribological tests were conducted using a rheometer under non-conformal contact. The normal force, temperature, and sliding speed were varied to simulate conditions such as those found in a food extruder. To simulate cold extrusion applications, water and bio-based FM mixtures were used. The best-performing bio-based FMs were then mixed with a polyalphaolefin to simulate warm extrusion conditions. The results were compared to those obtained from mixtures of a polyalphaolefin and selected conventional FMs. The main finding of this study demonstrated that rapeseed and salmon oils, with a peak coefficient of friction (COF) of 0.16, are the best-performing bio-based FMs for reducing friction. When mixed with distilled water for cold extrusion (case 1) and with polyalphaolefin for warm extrusion (case 2), they performed similarly to the conventional FM, tallow amine, also with a maximum COF of 0.16, and significantly better than polyalphaolefin alone (maximum COF of 0.25). Consequently, rapeseed and salmon oils are suitable bio-based FM candidates to replace conventional FMs in food-grade lubrication.
评估生物基摩擦改进剂在食品级润滑方面的潜力
这项研究的目的是找出一种摩擦学性能可与传统摩擦改进剂媲美的生物基摩擦改进剂(FM)。研究人员选择了传统摩擦改进剂的前景看好的替代品,如从油菜籽和鲑鱼油等天然来源提取的摩擦改进剂。人们对原油价格、环境影响和化石资源枯竭的担忧与日俱增,这进一步推动了对可再生、可生物降解和环保型润滑油原材料的探索。 在非形式接触条件下,使用流变仪进行了摩擦学测试。通过改变法向力、温度和滑动速度来模拟食品挤压机中的条件。为了模拟冷挤压应用,使用了水和生物基 FM 混合物。然后将性能最好的生物基 FM 与聚α烯烃混合,模拟热挤压条件。研究结果与聚α烯烃和选定的传统 FM 混合物的结果进行了比较。这项研究的主要结果表明,菜籽油和鲑鱼油的峰值摩擦系数(COF)为 0.16,是降低摩擦性能最好的生物基调频材料。当与蒸馏水混合用于冷挤压(情况 1)和与聚α烯烃混合用于热挤压(情况 2)时,它们的性能与传统的摩擦材料牛脂胺相似,最大 COF 也是 0.16,明显优于单独使用聚α烯烃(最大 COF 为 0.25)。因此,菜籽油和鲑鱼油是替代食品级润滑油中传统调质材料的合适生物基调质材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lubricants
Lubricants Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.70%
发文量
293
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is dedicated to the field of Tribology and closely related disciplines. This includes the fundamentals of the following topics: -Lubrication, comprising hydrostatics, hydrodynamics, elastohydrodynamics, mixed and boundary regimes of lubrication -Friction, comprising viscous shear, Newtonian and non-Newtonian traction, boundary friction -Wear, including adhesion, abrasion, tribo-corrosion, scuffing and scoring -Cavitation and erosion -Sub-surface stressing, fatigue spalling, pitting, micro-pitting -Contact Mechanics: elasticity, elasto-plasticity, adhesion, viscoelasticity, poroelasticity, coatings and solid lubricants, layered bonded and unbonded solids -Surface Science: topography, tribo-film formation, lubricant–surface combination, surface texturing, micro-hydrodynamics, micro-elastohydrodynamics -Rheology: Newtonian, non-Newtonian fluids, dilatants, pseudo-plastics, thixotropy, shear thinning -Physical chemistry of lubricants, boundary active species, adsorption, bonding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信