Qualitative Content and Discourse Analysis Comparing the Current Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation in Spain and England

Kate Rees, Leah McLaughlin, D. Paredes-Zapata, Cathy Miller, Nicholas Mays, Jane Noyes
{"title":"Qualitative Content and Discourse Analysis Comparing the Current Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation in Spain and England","authors":"Kate Rees, Leah McLaughlin, D. Paredes-Zapata, Cathy Miller, Nicholas Mays, Jane Noyes","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"England switched to an opt-out system of consent in 2020 aiming to increase the number of organs available. Spain also operates an opt-out system yet has almost twice the organ donations per million population compared with England. We aimed to identify both differences and similarities in the consent policies, documents and procedures in deceased donation between the two countries using comparative qualitative content and discourse analysis. Spain had simpler, locally tailored documents, the time taken for families to review and process information may be shorter, there were more pathways leading to organ donation in Spain, and more robust legal protections for the decisions individuals made in life. The language in the Spanish documents was one of support and reassurance. Documents in England by comparison appeared confusing, since additions were designed to protect the NHS against risk and made to previous document versions to reflect the law change rather than being entirely recast. If England’s ambition is to achieve consent rates similar to Spain this analysis has highlighted opportunities that could strengthen the English system-by giving individuals’ decisions recorded on the organ donor register legal weight, alongside unifying and simplifying consent policies and procedures to support families and healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":506324,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

England switched to an opt-out system of consent in 2020 aiming to increase the number of organs available. Spain also operates an opt-out system yet has almost twice the organ donations per million population compared with England. We aimed to identify both differences and similarities in the consent policies, documents and procedures in deceased donation between the two countries using comparative qualitative content and discourse analysis. Spain had simpler, locally tailored documents, the time taken for families to review and process information may be shorter, there were more pathways leading to organ donation in Spain, and more robust legal protections for the decisions individuals made in life. The language in the Spanish documents was one of support and reassurance. Documents in England by comparison appeared confusing, since additions were designed to protect the NHS against risk and made to previous document versions to reflect the law change rather than being entirely recast. If England’s ambition is to achieve consent rates similar to Spain this analysis has highlighted opportunities that could strengthen the English system-by giving individuals’ decisions recorded on the organ donor register legal weight, alongside unifying and simplifying consent policies and procedures to support families and healthcare professionals.
定性内容和话语分析:比较西班牙和英国现行的遗体器官捐献同意制度
英格兰于 2020 年改用选择不同意制度,旨在增加可用器官的数量。西班牙也实行选择退出制度,但其每百万人口的器官捐献数量几乎是英格兰的两倍。我们旨在通过比较定性内容和话语分析,找出两国在死者捐献同意政策、文件和程序方面的异同。西班牙的文件更简单,更符合当地情况,家属审查和处理信息的时间可能更短,西班牙的器官捐献途径更多,对个人生前决定的法律保护更有力。西班牙文件中的语言是支持和保证。相比之下,英格兰的文件显得混乱不堪,因为文件中增加的内容旨在保护国家医疗服务体系免受风险,并对之前的文件版本进行了修改,以反映法律的变化,而不是完全重新制定。如果英格兰的目标是实现与西班牙类似的同意率,那么本分析强调了可以加强英格兰系统的机会--赋予器官捐献者登记册上记录的个人决定以法律效力,同时统一并简化同意政策和程序,以支持家属和医护人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信