Comparative Nutrient Analysis of Prawn (Penaeus indicus), Crab (Scylla serrata), and Lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi)

Ayushi Singh, Meghana B. Talpade
{"title":"Comparative Nutrient Analysis of Prawn (Penaeus indicus), Crab (Scylla serrata), and Lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi)","authors":"Ayushi Singh, Meghana B. Talpade","doi":"10.56557/upjoz/2024/v45i144214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the proximate composition of three popular crustaceans: Prawns (Penaeus indicus), Crab (Scylla serrata), and Lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi). This paper aims to find proximate analysis that involves the determination of various components such as moisture content, protein, lipid, carbohydrate, and ash. These findings suggest that prawns, lobster, and crab differ in their nutritional composition, highlighting their potential as diverse sources of essential nutrients. Prawns may be a suitable option for individuals seeking a high-protein seafood choice with a protein content of 20.23g, whereas lobster may provide a richer source of carbohydrates at 1.093g. Crab, with its low fat at 2.2g and high mineral content, could be beneficial for individuals aiming to enhance their dietary intake of these nutrients. The findings of this paper conclude that crabs offer a preferable seafood option among crustaceans compared to prawns and lobsters. Further research could explore additional species of prawns, crabs, and lobsters to strengthen our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":278386,"journal":{"name":"UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2024/v45i144214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the proximate composition of three popular crustaceans: Prawns (Penaeus indicus), Crab (Scylla serrata), and Lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi). This paper aims to find proximate analysis that involves the determination of various components such as moisture content, protein, lipid, carbohydrate, and ash. These findings suggest that prawns, lobster, and crab differ in their nutritional composition, highlighting their potential as diverse sources of essential nutrients. Prawns may be a suitable option for individuals seeking a high-protein seafood choice with a protein content of 20.23g, whereas lobster may provide a richer source of carbohydrates at 1.093g. Crab, with its low fat at 2.2g and high mineral content, could be beneficial for individuals aiming to enhance their dietary intake of these nutrients. The findings of this paper conclude that crabs offer a preferable seafood option among crustaceans compared to prawns and lobsters. Further research could explore additional species of prawns, crabs, and lobsters to strengthen our conclusions.
对虾(Penaeus indicus)、蟹(Scylla serrata)和龙虾(Sagmariasus verreauxi)的营养成分比较分析
本文全面分析了三种常见甲壳类动物的近似成分:对虾(Penaeus indicus)、螃蟹(Scylla serrata)和龙虾(Sagmariasus verreauxi)。本文旨在研究近似分析,包括测定各种成分,如水分含量、蛋白质、脂质、碳水化合物和灰分。这些研究结果表明,对虾、龙虾和螃蟹的营养成分各不相同,凸显了它们作为多种必需营养素来源的潜力。大虾的蛋白质含量为 20.23 克,适合寻求高蛋白海产品的人,而龙虾的碳水化合物含量为 1.093 克,可提供更丰富的碳水化合物来源。螃蟹的脂肪含量较低,仅为 2.2 克,矿物质含量较高,对于希望从膳食中摄取更多这些营养成分的人来说是有益的。本文的研究结果认为,与对虾和龙虾相比,螃蟹是甲壳类海鲜中的首选。进一步的研究可以探索对虾、螃蟹和龙虾的其他种类,以加强我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信