Is the devil in the details? A qualitative exploration of differentiated mindsets during job search

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Lauren A. Keating, Peter A. Heslin
{"title":"Is the devil in the details? A qualitative exploration of differentiated mindsets during job search","authors":"Lauren A. Keating,&nbsp;Peter A. Heslin","doi":"10.1111/apps.12560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The literature on mindsets about the plasticity of personal attributes is largely comprised of between-person studies examining the self-regulatory implications of fixed and growth mindsets. Less attention has been paid to whether mindsets differ at the within-person level, such that individuals simultaneously hold differentiated mindsets about specific abilities. In the context of a looming job loss, we conducted a qualitative investigation into whether job seekers hold different mindsets regarding their job-related networking, vacancy searching, interviewing, and negotiating abilities. Beyond the present study providing evidence of differentiated mindsets about abilities, it illustrates how qualitative methods can enable the detection of more nuance in mindsets than is currently captured in the almost universally quantitative mindset literature. These nuances include observations of how mindsets are deduced from one's experiences, the prevalence of mixed mindsets wherein individuals hold both fixed- and growth-oriented views, and that self-labeling is not only the province of fixed mindsets. Such insights have important implications for both updating assumptions about the ontology of mindsets, as well as for facilitating job seekers' engagement in various job search initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12560","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature on mindsets about the plasticity of personal attributes is largely comprised of between-person studies examining the self-regulatory implications of fixed and growth mindsets. Less attention has been paid to whether mindsets differ at the within-person level, such that individuals simultaneously hold differentiated mindsets about specific abilities. In the context of a looming job loss, we conducted a qualitative investigation into whether job seekers hold different mindsets regarding their job-related networking, vacancy searching, interviewing, and negotiating abilities. Beyond the present study providing evidence of differentiated mindsets about abilities, it illustrates how qualitative methods can enable the detection of more nuance in mindsets than is currently captured in the almost universally quantitative mindset literature. These nuances include observations of how mindsets are deduced from one's experiences, the prevalence of mixed mindsets wherein individuals hold both fixed- and growth-oriented views, and that self-labeling is not only the province of fixed mindsets. Such insights have important implications for both updating assumptions about the ontology of mindsets, as well as for facilitating job seekers' engagement in various job search initiatives.

细节决定成败?求职过程中不同心态的定性探索
关于个人特质可塑性思维定势的文献主要包括人与人之间的研究,研究固定思维定势和成长思维定势的自我调节影响。人们较少关注思维定势在人内层面是否存在差异,即个人同时对特定能力持有不同的思维定势。在即将失业的背景下,我们进行了一项定性调查,研究求职者在与工作相关的网络、空缺职位搜索、面试和谈判能力方面是否持有不同的心态。本研究不仅提供了有关能力的不同心态的证据,还说明了定性方法如何能够发现心态中更多的细微差别,而这些细微差别目前几乎都被定量的心态文献所捕捉到。这些细微差别包括观察思维定势是如何从一个人的经验中推导出来的,混合思维定势的普遍性,即个人同时持有固定型和成长型观点,以及自我标签不仅仅是固定思维定势的专利。这些见解对于更新有关思维定势本体的假设以及促进求职者参与各种求职活动都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信