Learning Styles and Mental Health in Higher Education Students

Q3 Social Sciences
Verónica Adriana Freire Palacios, Ramiro Eduardo Torres Vizuete, Adriana Carolina Sánchez Acosta, Renata Patricia Aguilera Vásconez, Diego Armando Santos Pazos, Adriana Salomé Polo Ureña
{"title":"Learning Styles and Mental Health in Higher Education Students","authors":"Verónica Adriana Freire Palacios, Ramiro Eduardo Torres Vizuete, Adriana Carolina Sánchez Acosta, Renata Patricia Aguilera Vásconez, Diego Armando Santos Pazos, Adriana Salomé Polo Ureña","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the relationship between learning styles and mental health in university students through a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Three specific research questions are formulated: (1) Is there an association between learning styles and mental health outcomes? (2) Do these associations vary based on sociodemographic characteristics? and (3) What are the most used instruments to assess these constructs? The methodology includes a systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and evaluation of methodological quality. After applying strict criteria, 30 relevant observational studies are selected. The NIH tool assesses the risk of bias, and bibliometric analysis identifies patterns in academic production. The diversity of instruments is notable, with the Kolb questionnaire being the most prevalent. Academic production has increased since 2018, with Scopus as the main source. In mental health, depressive symptoms are the most evaluated. Most studies have a low risk of bias. The review provides an updated synthesis of the relationship between learning styles and mental health in university students, identifying patterns and gaps. Although methodological quality is generally high, potential biases and variable instruments are acknowledged. Future research is proposed to explore specific associations and consider contextual factors, emphasizing the importance of addressing this complex relationship in the university environment. \n  \nReceived: 6 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 May 2024 / Published: 5 July 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines the relationship between learning styles and mental health in university students through a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Three specific research questions are formulated: (1) Is there an association between learning styles and mental health outcomes? (2) Do these associations vary based on sociodemographic characteristics? and (3) What are the most used instruments to assess these constructs? The methodology includes a systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and evaluation of methodological quality. After applying strict criteria, 30 relevant observational studies are selected. The NIH tool assesses the risk of bias, and bibliometric analysis identifies patterns in academic production. The diversity of instruments is notable, with the Kolb questionnaire being the most prevalent. Academic production has increased since 2018, with Scopus as the main source. In mental health, depressive symptoms are the most evaluated. Most studies have a low risk of bias. The review provides an updated synthesis of the relationship between learning styles and mental health in university students, identifying patterns and gaps. Although methodological quality is generally high, potential biases and variable instruments are acknowledged. Future research is proposed to explore specific associations and consider contextual factors, emphasizing the importance of addressing this complex relationship in the university environment.   Received: 6 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 May 2024 / Published: 5 July 2024
高校学生的学习风格与心理健康
本研究通过系统综述和文献计量分析,探讨了大学生学习风格与心理健康之间的关系。本研究提出了三个具体的研究问题:(1) 学习风格与心理健康结果之间是否存在关联?(2) 这些关联是否因社会人口特征而异?研究方法包括系统综述、文献计量分析和方法质量评估。经过严格的标准筛选,选出了 30 项相关的观察性研究。美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估了偏倚风险,文献计量分析则确定了学术成果的模式。工具的多样性值得注意,其中科尔布问卷最为普遍。2018 年以来,学术成果有所增加,Scopus 是主要来源。在心理健康方面,抑郁症状的评估最多。大多数研究的偏倚风险较低。该综述对大学生学习方式与心理健康之间的关系进行了最新综述,找出了规律和差距。虽然研究方法的质量普遍较高,但也承认存在潜在的偏差和可变的工具。建议未来的研究探索具体的关联并考虑背景因素,强调在大学环境中处理这种复杂关系的重要性。 收到:接受:2024 年 3 月 6 日 / 接受:2024 年 5 月 26 日 / 发表:2024 年 7 月 5 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信