J. Dugan, J. Jo, C. C. Long, K. Williams, S. Zuckerman, D. Terry
{"title":"A - 54 Changes in the Blink Reflex after a Sport-Related Concussion: Test–Retest Reliability of a Blink Reflexometer","authors":"J. Dugan, J. Jo, C. C. Long, K. Williams, S. Zuckerman, D. Terry","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The blink reflex may be affected by concussion, but psychometric analyses examining devices that measure the blink reflex are limited. This study assessed the test–retest reliability of the Blinkcns EyeStatTM device at two pre-season baseline time points in a cohort of healthy high school athletes.\n \n \n \n During pre-season, high school athletes completed the EyeStatTM scanning twice, 15-minutes apart. Pearson/Spearman correlations and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC, i.e., the measure of test re-test reliability) were calculated across 10 different parameters (e.g., latency, total blink time, oscillations, time to open/close). Additionally, t-tests examined if these parameters differed based on biological sex, sleep status (i.e., <8 vs. ≥8 hours the night before), and prior concussion history (i.e., 0 vs. ≥1 prior concussions).\n \n \n \n Of the 48 athletes (age, M = 16.0¬ ± 1.2 years), 35.4% were female. Correlations ranged from 0.45–0.82 (all p-values<0.001) between the two assessments, and ICCs were 0.46–0.87 (all p-values<0.02). Additionally, none of the Eyestat parameters were significantly associated with biological sex, sleep status, or prior concussion history (all p-values>0.05).\n \n \n \n This study suggests substantial test–retest reliability of the EyeStatTM device across 10 parameters in a cohort of healthy high school athletes. The findings support the potential utility of the EyeStatTM device as a reliable baseline measure for assessing the blink reflex among young athletes.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.54","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The blink reflex may be affected by concussion, but psychometric analyses examining devices that measure the blink reflex are limited. This study assessed the test–retest reliability of the Blinkcns EyeStatTM device at two pre-season baseline time points in a cohort of healthy high school athletes.
During pre-season, high school athletes completed the EyeStatTM scanning twice, 15-minutes apart. Pearson/Spearman correlations and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC, i.e., the measure of test re-test reliability) were calculated across 10 different parameters (e.g., latency, total blink time, oscillations, time to open/close). Additionally, t-tests examined if these parameters differed based on biological sex, sleep status (i.e., <8 vs. ≥8 hours the night before), and prior concussion history (i.e., 0 vs. ≥1 prior concussions).
Of the 48 athletes (age, M = 16.0¬ ± 1.2 years), 35.4% were female. Correlations ranged from 0.45–0.82 (all p-values<0.001) between the two assessments, and ICCs were 0.46–0.87 (all p-values<0.02). Additionally, none of the Eyestat parameters were significantly associated with biological sex, sleep status, or prior concussion history (all p-values>0.05).
This study suggests substantial test–retest reliability of the EyeStatTM device across 10 parameters in a cohort of healthy high school athletes. The findings support the potential utility of the EyeStatTM device as a reliable baseline measure for assessing the blink reflex among young athletes.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.