E-Proctoring Tools: Is It a Necessary Inconvenience

Yan Gibson, Randy Kuhn
{"title":"E-Proctoring Tools: Is It a Necessary Inconvenience","authors":"Yan Gibson, Randy Kuhn","doi":"10.33423/jhetp.v24i7.7088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the challenges all institutions faced during the COVID lockdown between March 2020 and 2021 was keeping the academic integrity of online assessment. E-proctoring tools became a convenient option, although their effectiveness and efficiency were uninvestigated. The authors of this study utilized the fraud investigation frameworks and focused on the element of opportunity in the context of E-assessment. The quantitative study on grades and testing times between E-proctored and non-proctored online tests revealed significant differences in both academic performance and testing time. Students performed significantly better and used remarkably more time when proctoring tools were not used. The findings strongly indicated cheating behaviors when students took advantage of not being caught for their misconduct. The drastic variances also indicate the deterrence effects of E-proctoring tools on students’ testing behaviors.","PeriodicalId":512130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i7.7088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the challenges all institutions faced during the COVID lockdown between March 2020 and 2021 was keeping the academic integrity of online assessment. E-proctoring tools became a convenient option, although their effectiveness and efficiency were uninvestigated. The authors of this study utilized the fraud investigation frameworks and focused on the element of opportunity in the context of E-assessment. The quantitative study on grades and testing times between E-proctored and non-proctored online tests revealed significant differences in both academic performance and testing time. Students performed significantly better and used remarkably more time when proctoring tools were not used. The findings strongly indicated cheating behaviors when students took advantage of not being caught for their misconduct. The drastic variances also indicate the deterrence effects of E-proctoring tools on students’ testing behaviors.
电子监考工具:电子监考工具:这是否是必要的麻烦?
在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月 COVID 关闭期间,所有机构面临的挑战之一是保持在线评估的学术完整性。电子监考工具成为一种便捷的选择,但其有效性和效率却未得到调查。本研究的作者利用欺诈调查框架,重点关注电子评估中的机会因素。对电子监考和非监考在线测试的成绩和测试时间进行的定量研究显示,两者在学习成绩和测试时间上都存在显著差异。在不使用监考工具的情况下,学生的成绩明显更好,所用时间也明显更长。调查结果表明,当学生利用自己的不当行为不被发现时,就会出现作弊行为。巨大的差异也表明了电子监考工具对学生考试行为的威慑作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书