Effects of an elimination diet and a healthy diet in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: 1-Year prospective follow-up of a two-arm randomized, controlled study (TRACE study)
Annick Huberts-Bosch, Margreet Bierens, Julia J. Rucklidge, Verena Ly, Rogier Donders, Gigi H. H. van de Loo-Neus, Alejandro Arias-Vasquez, Helen Klip, Jan K. Buitelaar, Saskia W. van den Berg, Nanda N. Rommelse
{"title":"Effects of an elimination diet and a healthy diet in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: 1-Year prospective follow-up of a two-arm randomized, controlled study (TRACE study)","authors":"Annick Huberts-Bosch, Margreet Bierens, Julia J. Rucklidge, Verena Ly, Rogier Donders, Gigi H. H. van de Loo-Neus, Alejandro Arias-Vasquez, Helen Klip, Jan K. Buitelaar, Saskia W. van den Berg, Nanda N. Rommelse","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>An Elimination Diet (ED) or Healthy Diet (HD) may be effective in reducing symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but long-term maintenance effects and feasibility have never been examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One-year prospective follow-up of a sample of 165 children (5–12 years) with ADHD randomized (unblinded; 1:1) to 5 weeks treatment with either ED (<i>N</i> = 84) or HD (<i>N</i> = 81) and a non-randomized comparator arm including 58 children being treated with Care as Usual (CAU). Dietary participants were allowed to add or switch to CAU treatment after 5 weeks. The primary outcome was a 5-point ordinal measure of improvement based on both parent and teacher ratings on ADHD and dysregulation problems, determined after 1 year prospective follow-up. Ordinal regression analyses and linear mixed models analyses were conducted on an intention to treat basis. In addition, as-treated analyses were performed. The trial is closed and registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NL5324.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 1 year follow-up, 24% of the participants still complied with the ED and 37% still complied with the HD. In the ED (+CAU) trajectory, fewer participants showed (partial) improvement after 1-year prospective follow-up compared to the HD (+CAU) trajectory (47% vs. 64%, χ<sup>2</sup> (4, <i>N</i> = 152) = 11.97, <i>p</i> = 0.018). The HD (+CAU) - but not ED (+CAU) - trajectory had comparable 1-year outcomes compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory. Results for secondary outcomes (e.g. health, parental stress) did not differ between the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories. The prevalence of psychostimulant use was lower in the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory (38%, 45%, 78%, respectively). Predictors for long-term benefit from dietary treatments included high initial severity of ADHD problems, low severity of emotional problems and sufficient parental mental resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In line with the short-term effects, prospective 1-year follow-up outcomes are in favor of treatment with HD and not ED. Initial 5-week treatment with HD and if needed/preferred followed by CAU may reduce psychostimulant use without negatively impacting 1-year outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12257","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
An Elimination Diet (ED) or Healthy Diet (HD) may be effective in reducing symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but long-term maintenance effects and feasibility have never been examined.
Methods
One-year prospective follow-up of a sample of 165 children (5–12 years) with ADHD randomized (unblinded; 1:1) to 5 weeks treatment with either ED (N = 84) or HD (N = 81) and a non-randomized comparator arm including 58 children being treated with Care as Usual (CAU). Dietary participants were allowed to add or switch to CAU treatment after 5 weeks. The primary outcome was a 5-point ordinal measure of improvement based on both parent and teacher ratings on ADHD and dysregulation problems, determined after 1 year prospective follow-up. Ordinal regression analyses and linear mixed models analyses were conducted on an intention to treat basis. In addition, as-treated analyses were performed. The trial is closed and registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NL5324.
Results
At 1 year follow-up, 24% of the participants still complied with the ED and 37% still complied with the HD. In the ED (+CAU) trajectory, fewer participants showed (partial) improvement after 1-year prospective follow-up compared to the HD (+CAU) trajectory (47% vs. 64%, χ2 (4, N = 152) = 11.97, p = 0.018). The HD (+CAU) - but not ED (+CAU) - trajectory had comparable 1-year outcomes compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory. Results for secondary outcomes (e.g. health, parental stress) did not differ between the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories. The prevalence of psychostimulant use was lower in the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory (38%, 45%, 78%, respectively). Predictors for long-term benefit from dietary treatments included high initial severity of ADHD problems, low severity of emotional problems and sufficient parental mental resources.
Conclusions
In line with the short-term effects, prospective 1-year follow-up outcomes are in favor of treatment with HD and not ED. Initial 5-week treatment with HD and if needed/preferred followed by CAU may reduce psychostimulant use without negatively impacting 1-year outcomes.