Temporal Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Method of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (mi-PGT-A) in Human Embryos

Katharine R. B. Phillips, Alexander G. Kuzma-Hunt, Michael S. Neal, Connie Lisle, Hariharan Sribalachandran, Ronald F. Carter, Shilpa Amin, M. Karnis, Mehrnoosh Faghih
{"title":"Temporal Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Method of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (mi-PGT-A) in Human Embryos","authors":"Katharine R. B. Phillips, Alexander G. Kuzma-Hunt, Michael S. Neal, Connie Lisle, Hariharan Sribalachandran, Ronald F. Carter, Shilpa Amin, M. Karnis, Mehrnoosh Faghih","doi":"10.3390/reprodmed5030011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become a useful approach for embryo selection following IVF and ICSI. However, the biopsy process associated with PGT-A is expensive, prone to errors in embryo ploidy determination, and potentially damaging, impacting competence and implantation potential. Therefore, a less invasive method of PGT-A would be desirable and more cost-effective. Noninvasive methods for PGT-A (ni-PGT-A) have been well-studied but present limitations in terms of cf-DNA origin and diagnostic accuracy. Minimally invasive pre-implantation genetic testing (mi-PGT-A) for frozen-thawed embryo transfer is a promising, less studied approach that utilizes a combination of spent culture media (SCM) and blastocoelic fluid (BF)-derived cell-free (CF)-DNA for genetic testing. This study aimed to optimize the effectiveness of mi-PGT-A for aneuploidy diagnosis by investigating the optimal temporal sequence for this protocol. SCM+BF was collected at either 48 or 72 h of culture after thawing day 3 preimplantation embryos. cf-DNA in the SCM+BF was amplified, analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and compared with results from the corresponding whole embryos (WEs) obtained from human embryos donated for research. Fifty-three (42 expanded blastocysts, 9 early blastocysts, and 2 morula) WE and SCM+BF samples were analyzed and compared. The overall concordance rate between SCM+BF and WE was 60%. Gender and ploidy concordance improved with extended culture time from 48 h (73% and 45%) to 72 h (100% and 64%), respectively. These results demonstrate that SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA can be successfully used for mi-PGT-A. Our findings indicate that longer embryo culture time prior to SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA analysis improves DNA detection rate and concordance with WEs and decreases the proportion of false positive results.","PeriodicalId":516007,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become a useful approach for embryo selection following IVF and ICSI. However, the biopsy process associated with PGT-A is expensive, prone to errors in embryo ploidy determination, and potentially damaging, impacting competence and implantation potential. Therefore, a less invasive method of PGT-A would be desirable and more cost-effective. Noninvasive methods for PGT-A (ni-PGT-A) have been well-studied but present limitations in terms of cf-DNA origin and diagnostic accuracy. Minimally invasive pre-implantation genetic testing (mi-PGT-A) for frozen-thawed embryo transfer is a promising, less studied approach that utilizes a combination of spent culture media (SCM) and blastocoelic fluid (BF)-derived cell-free (CF)-DNA for genetic testing. This study aimed to optimize the effectiveness of mi-PGT-A for aneuploidy diagnosis by investigating the optimal temporal sequence for this protocol. SCM+BF was collected at either 48 or 72 h of culture after thawing day 3 preimplantation embryos. cf-DNA in the SCM+BF was amplified, analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and compared with results from the corresponding whole embryos (WEs) obtained from human embryos donated for research. Fifty-three (42 expanded blastocysts, 9 early blastocysts, and 2 morula) WE and SCM+BF samples were analyzed and compared. The overall concordance rate between SCM+BF and WE was 60%. Gender and ploidy concordance improved with extended culture time from 48 h (73% and 45%) to 72 h (100% and 64%), respectively. These results demonstrate that SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA can be successfully used for mi-PGT-A. Our findings indicate that longer embryo culture time prior to SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA analysis improves DNA detection rate and concordance with WEs and decreases the proportion of false positive results.
人类胚胎非整倍体植入前遗传检测微创方法(mi-PGT-A)的时间评估
胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)已成为体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子显微注射后选择胚胎的有效方法。然而,与 PGT-A 相关的活检过程成本高昂,容易造成胚胎倍性测定错误,并可能造成损伤,影响胚胎的能力和植入潜力。因此,一种创伤较小的 PGT-A 方法将更为理想且更具成本效益。无创的 PGT-A 方法(ni-PGT-A)已经得到了充分的研究,但在 cf-DNA 来源和诊断准确性方面存在局限性。用于冷冻解冻胚胎移植的微创植入前基因检测(mi-PGT-A)是一种前景广阔但研究较少的方法,它综合利用乏培养基(SCM)和胚泡液(BF)衍生的无细胞 DNA 进行基因检测。本研究旨在通过研究该方案的最佳时间序列,优化 mi-PGT-A 在非整倍体诊断中的有效性。SCM+BF中的cf-DNA经扩增后通过下一代测序(NGS)进行分析,并与从捐赠用于研究的人类胚胎中获得的相应全胚胎(WEs)的结果进行比较。对 53 个(42 个扩大囊胚、9 个早期囊胚和 2 个畸形囊胚)WE 和 SCM+BF 样本进行了分析和比较。SCM+BF 和 WE 的总体一致率为 60%。随着培养时间从 48 小时(73% 和 45%)延长到 72 小时(100% 和 64%),性别和倍性的一致性有所提高。这些结果表明,SCM+BF 衍生的 cf-DNA 可成功用于 mi-PGT-A。我们的研究结果表明,在进行 SCM+BF 衍生 cf-DNA 分析前延长胚胎培养时间可提高 DNA 检测率和与 WEs 的一致性,并降低假阳性结果的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信