Effectiveness of Using the Magnetic Mallet for Ridge Splitting of the Narrow Posterior Mandibular Ridge with Simultaneous Implant Placement (A Clinical Trial)

Mohamed Hisham Salama, N. Mohamed, Marwa G. Noureldin
{"title":"Effectiveness of Using the Magnetic Mallet for Ridge Splitting of the Narrow Posterior Mandibular Ridge with Simultaneous Implant Placement (A Clinical Trial)","authors":"Mohamed Hisham Salama, N. Mohamed, Marwa G. Noureldin","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2024.238963.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Implant placement in the posterior mandible is sometimes problematic due to loss of horizontal bone width after extraction of posterior teeth. With simultaneous implant placement, the Magnetic Mallet can be used in horizontal bone compaction and expansion. OBJECTIVES: To clinically and radiographically evaluate bone width change using the magnetic mallet for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge. The secondary aim was to radiographically evaluate bone density change using the magnetic mallet for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge and the implant stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with narrow posterior mandibular edentulous ridges underwent ridge splitting using the magnetic mallet and osseodensification with simultaneous implant placement. The assessment comprised a cone beam computed tomography analysis of bone width and bone density change at two weeks, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, implant stability was measured using Osstell. RESULTS: The mean bone density preoperatively (480.73±119.38 HU) increased significantly six months after ridge splitting and osseodensification (697.89±86.90 HU). Implant stability also significantly increased at four months postoperatively (62.50±2.64) than immediate postoperative (52.40±3.63) ( p <.001). Bone width showed a significant increase at six months postoperatively (10.34±0.78 mm) when compared with preoperative (8.45±0.84 mm) ( p <.001). CONCLUSION: The magnetic mallet is an effective and minimally invasive method for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge with simultaneous implant placement for horizontal bone augmentation. A significant increase in bone width, bone density, good implant stability, and minimal postoperative pain evidence this. Furthermore, the technique is believed to be safe and less time-consuming, eliminating the costs and need for bone grafting and saving time, since no need for a second surgery.","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 1127","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2024.238963.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Implant placement in the posterior mandible is sometimes problematic due to loss of horizontal bone width after extraction of posterior teeth. With simultaneous implant placement, the Magnetic Mallet can be used in horizontal bone compaction and expansion. OBJECTIVES: To clinically and radiographically evaluate bone width change using the magnetic mallet for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge. The secondary aim was to radiographically evaluate bone density change using the magnetic mallet for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge and the implant stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with narrow posterior mandibular edentulous ridges underwent ridge splitting using the magnetic mallet and osseodensification with simultaneous implant placement. The assessment comprised a cone beam computed tomography analysis of bone width and bone density change at two weeks, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, implant stability was measured using Osstell. RESULTS: The mean bone density preoperatively (480.73±119.38 HU) increased significantly six months after ridge splitting and osseodensification (697.89±86.90 HU). Implant stability also significantly increased at four months postoperatively (62.50±2.64) than immediate postoperative (52.40±3.63) ( p <.001). Bone width showed a significant increase at six months postoperatively (10.34±0.78 mm) when compared with preoperative (8.45±0.84 mm) ( p <.001). CONCLUSION: The magnetic mallet is an effective and minimally invasive method for ridge splitting of the narrow posterior mandibular ridge with simultaneous implant placement for horizontal bone augmentation. A significant increase in bone width, bone density, good implant stability, and minimal postoperative pain evidence this. Furthermore, the technique is believed to be safe and less time-consuming, eliminating the costs and need for bone grafting and saving time, since no need for a second surgery.
使用磁槌劈开下颌后窄嵴并同时植入种植体的有效性(临床试验)
简介:由于后牙拔除后水平骨宽度的丧失,在下颌后部植入种植体有时会出现问题。在植入种植体的同时,磁槌可用于水平骨的压实和扩张。目的使用磁槌对狭窄的下颌后嵴进行骨劈裂,从临床和影像学角度评估骨宽度的变化。次要目的是使用磁槌对下颌窄后嵴劈裂的骨密度变化和种植体稳定性进行放射学评估。材料和方法:十名下颌后窄嵴缺牙患者接受了磁力槌劈嵴术和骨质增生术,并同时植入了种植体。评估包括术后两周、4 个月和 6 个月骨宽度和骨密度变化的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析。此外,还使用 Osstell 测量了种植体的稳定性。结果:术前的平均骨密度(480.73±119.38 HU)在骨嵴分割和骨密度化六个月后显著增加(697.89±86.90 HU)。种植体稳定性在术后四个月(62.50±2.64)也明显高于术后即刻(52.40±3.63)(P <0.001)。术后六个月的骨宽度(10.34±0.78 mm)比术前(8.45±0.84 mm)明显增加(P <.001)。结论:磁槌是一种有效的微创方法,可用于劈开狭窄的下颌后嵴,并同时植入种植体进行水平骨增量。骨宽度和骨密度的明显增加、种植体的良好稳定性以及术后疼痛的最小化都证明了这一点。此外,该技术还被认为安全、耗时少,无需二次手术,从而省去了植骨的费用和需要,节省了时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信