Short-term rentals and residential rents: evidence from a regulation in Santa Monica

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Cayrua Chaves Fonseca
{"title":"Short-term rentals and residential rents: evidence from a regulation in Santa Monica","authors":"Cayrua Chaves Fonseca","doi":"10.1108/ijhma-01-2024-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the relationship between Airbnb and long-term residential rents, using Santa Monica, California, as a case study. In 2015, Santa Monica adopted the home sharing ordinance (HSO), a stringent regulation aimed at restricting short-term rentals (STR). This research examines the implications of this ordinance on the local housing market.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe synthetic control method (SCM) is applied to a panel data set comprising Airbnb listings and residential rents from multiple cities in Los Angeles County. This approach is used to estimate the causal effects of Santa Monica’s HSO on two outcomes: Airbnb listings and residential rents.\n\n\nFindings\nThe empirical results show a 60% reduction in Airbnb listings in Santa Monica within two years of implementing the ordinance. Despite this significant decrease, the effect of the regulation on rents was not significant. Suggestive evidence indicates that the ordinance’s ineffectiveness in increasing the number of houses allocated to long-term tenants may have contributed to its negligible impact on rental rates.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this research is the first to use the SCM for evaluating the impact of STR regulations. It offers crucial insights to policymakers on regulating platforms like Airbnb. The study reveals a scenario where a marked decrease in Airbnb activity did not lower residential rents, highlighting the need for context-specific evaluations in understanding the housing market’s dynamics. Additionally, these findings are valuable for investors considering the implications of regulatory changes in the STR sector.\n","PeriodicalId":14136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-01-2024-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between Airbnb and long-term residential rents, using Santa Monica, California, as a case study. In 2015, Santa Monica adopted the home sharing ordinance (HSO), a stringent regulation aimed at restricting short-term rentals (STR). This research examines the implications of this ordinance on the local housing market. Design/methodology/approach The synthetic control method (SCM) is applied to a panel data set comprising Airbnb listings and residential rents from multiple cities in Los Angeles County. This approach is used to estimate the causal effects of Santa Monica’s HSO on two outcomes: Airbnb listings and residential rents. Findings The empirical results show a 60% reduction in Airbnb listings in Santa Monica within two years of implementing the ordinance. Despite this significant decrease, the effect of the regulation on rents was not significant. Suggestive evidence indicates that the ordinance’s ineffectiveness in increasing the number of houses allocated to long-term tenants may have contributed to its negligible impact on rental rates. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this research is the first to use the SCM for evaluating the impact of STR regulations. It offers crucial insights to policymakers on regulating platforms like Airbnb. The study reveals a scenario where a marked decrease in Airbnb activity did not lower residential rents, highlighting the need for context-specific evaluations in understanding the housing market’s dynamics. Additionally, these findings are valuable for investors considering the implications of regulatory changes in the STR sector.
短期租赁与住宅租金:圣莫尼卡监管措施的证据
目的 本研究旨在以加利福尼亚州圣莫尼卡市为案例,调查 Airbnb 与长期住宅租金之间的关系。2015 年,圣莫尼卡通过了房屋共享条例(HSO),这是一项旨在限制短期租赁(STR)的严格法规。本研究探讨了该条例对当地住房市场的影响。设计/方法/途径将合成控制法(SCM)应用于面板数据集,该数据集由洛杉矶县多个城市的 Airbnb 房源和住宅租金组成。该方法用于估算圣莫尼卡 HSO 对两种结果的因果效应:实证结果表明,圣莫尼卡的 Airbnb 房源在法令实施两年内减少了 60%。尽管数量大幅减少,但该法规对租金的影响并不显著。提示性证据表明,该条例未能有效增加分配给长期租户的房屋数量,这可能是其对租金影响微乎其微的原因之一。 原创性/价值 据作者所知,该研究是首次使用单因素模型评估 STR 法规的影响。它为政策制定者监管 Airbnb 等平台提供了重要启示。研究揭示了一种情况,即 Airbnb 活动的显著减少并没有降低住宅租金,这凸显了在了解住房市场动态时进行具体评估的必要性。此外,这些发现对于投资者考虑 STR 行业监管变化的影响也很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
29.40%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信