Revision of the Self-rating Scale of Systemic Family Dynamics Based on the Applicability among College Students in Southwest China

Yinqiu Tan, Xia Kong, Yanli Chen
{"title":"Revision of the Self-rating Scale of Systemic Family Dynamics Based on the Applicability among College Students in Southwest China","authors":"Yinqiu Tan, Xia Kong, Yanli Chen","doi":"10.26689/ssr.v6i6.7333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To revise the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) based on its applicability among college students in southwest China. Methods: The study conducted a survey using the Chinese version of the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale (CES-D) on 3,122 college students from Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the items of SSFD by SPSS, followed by confirmatory factor analysis by Amos. Results: Based on the factor analysis, the systemic logic dimension of the original scale was removed, retaining three dimensions: family atmosphere, individualization, and disease concepts. The number of items was reduced from 23 to 14. The revised scale’s overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.914, with dimension-specific Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.689 to 0.905. All dimensions and the total score of the revised SSFD showed significant negative correlations with depression (-0.193**, -0.237**, -0.086**, -0.168**). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices (GFI = 0.943, IFI = 0.950, CFI = 0.950, NFI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.069, SMRA = 0.037). Conclusion: The revised SISFD scale features a clear structure and meets measurement standards, making it suitable for measuring systemic family dynamics among southwest China college students.","PeriodicalId":498606,"journal":{"name":"Scientific and social research","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific and social research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v6i6.7333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To revise the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) based on its applicability among college students in southwest China. Methods: The study conducted a survey using the Chinese version of the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale (CES-D) on 3,122 college students from Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the items of SSFD by SPSS, followed by confirmatory factor analysis by Amos. Results: Based on the factor analysis, the systemic logic dimension of the original scale was removed, retaining three dimensions: family atmosphere, individualization, and disease concepts. The number of items was reduced from 23 to 14. The revised scale’s overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.914, with dimension-specific Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.689 to 0.905. All dimensions and the total score of the revised SSFD showed significant negative correlations with depression (-0.193**, -0.237**, -0.086**, -0.168**). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices (GFI = 0.943, IFI = 0.950, CFI = 0.950, NFI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.069, SMRA = 0.037). Conclusion: The revised SISFD scale features a clear structure and meets measurement standards, making it suitable for measuring systemic family dynamics among southwest China college students.
基于西南地区大学生适用性的 "系统家庭动力自评量表 "修订版
目的根据系统性家庭动力自评量表(SSFD)在西南地区大学生中的适用性,对其进行修订。方法:采用中文版系统家庭动力自评量表进行调查:本研究使用中文版系统家庭动力自评量表(SSFD)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)对四川、重庆和贵州的 3122 名大学生进行了调查。用 SPSS 对 SSFD 的项目进行了探索性因子分析,然后用 Amos 进行了确认性因子分析。结果显示根据因子分析结果,删除了原量表中的系统逻辑维度,保留了家庭氛围、个体化和疾病观念三个维度。项目数从 23 个减少到 14 个。修订后量表的总体 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.914,各维度的 Cronbach's alpha 在 0.689 至 0.905 之间。修订版 SSFD 的所有维度和总分均与抑郁呈显著负相关(-0.193**、-0.237**、-0.086**、-0.168**)。确认性因子分析显示了良好的拟合指数(GFI = 0.943、IFI = 0.950、CFI = 0.950、NFI = 0.944、RMSEA = 0.069、SMRA = 0.037)。结论修订后的 SISFD 量表结构清晰,符合测量标准,适用于测量西南地区大学生的系统家庭动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信