The comparison study on accuracy of peak expiratory flow rate measurement by PRAAN, spirometry, and the mini-Wright peak flow meterÂ Â

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.144927.1

Sirawich Chaiparnich, O. Poachanukoon, Natcha Manasilp, N. Saiphoklang, C. Tantibundhit, P. Vatcharavongvan, Pattapol Kunumpol, Phongpan Plienphanich, A. Pugongchai, K. Leelasittikul, Nantavat Prompoom

{"title":"The comparison study on accuracy of peak expiratory flow rate measurement by PRAAN, spirometry, and the mini-Wright peak flow meterÂ Â","authors":"Sirawich Chaiparnich, O. Poachanukoon, Natcha Manasilp, N. Saiphoklang, C. Tantibundhit, P. Vatcharavongvan, Pattapol Kunumpol, Phongpan Plienphanich, A. Pugongchai, K. Leelasittikul, Nantavat Prompoom","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.144927.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background PRAAN, a digital peak flow meter, was developed to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) for asthma monitoring. This study aimed to compare PRAAN’s accuracy to that of spirometry and the mini-Wright peak flow meter for PEFR measurement. Methods Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in 106 healthy adult participants. Study A (n=56) compared PRAAN with spirometry, while study B (n=50) compared PRAAN with the mini-Wright peak flow meter. PEFR values were collected using crossover studies. Pearson’s correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used to report the relationship and agreement between two measurements, respectively. Results In study A, 51.8% were female, mean age was 24.3±5.6 years, and PEFR was 480.3±86.8 L/min. PEFR measured by PRAAN had very strongly positive correlation with spirometry (r=0.980, P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was good agreement between them, with a low mean difference of -7.07 liters/minute (95% CI: -40.58 to 26.44 liters/minute) and 92.9%, which were within the limit of agreement (LOA). In study B, 54.0% were female, mean age was 23.5±2.4 years, and PEFR was 495.1±82.7 L/min. PEFR measured by PRAAN and by the mini-Wright peak flow meter showed very strongly positive correlation (r=0.971, P<0.001). Bland-Altman comparison of PEFR between these two measurements showed that there was a very good agreement between them, with a low mean difference of 0.84 liters/minute (95% CI: -38.68 to 40.38 liters/minute) and 94.0%, which were within LOA. Conclusions The accuracy of PRAAN is in the agreement with spirometry and the mini-Wright peak flow meter. The clinical application of PRAAN may potentially lead to a monitoring strategy that healthcare providers can use to improve the management of asthma.","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144927.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background PRAAN, a digital peak flow meter, was developed to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) for asthma monitoring. This study aimed to compare PRAAN’s accuracy to that of spirometry and the mini-Wright peak flow meter for PEFR measurement. Methods Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in 106 healthy adult participants. Study A (n=56) compared PRAAN with spirometry, while study B (n=50) compared PRAAN with the mini-Wright peak flow meter. PEFR values were collected using crossover studies. Pearson’s correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used to report the relationship and agreement between two measurements, respectively. Results In study A, 51.8% were female, mean age was 24.3±5.6 years, and PEFR was 480.3±86.8 L/min. PEFR measured by PRAAN had very strongly positive correlation with spirometry (r=0.980, P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was good agreement between them, with a low mean difference of -7.07 liters/minute (95% CI: -40.58 to 26.44 liters/minute) and 92.9%, which were within the limit of agreement (LOA). In study B, 54.0% were female, mean age was 23.5±2.4 years, and PEFR was 495.1±82.7 L/min. PEFR measured by PRAAN and by the mini-Wright peak flow meter showed very strongly positive correlation (r=0.971, P<0.001). Bland-Altman comparison of PEFR between these two measurements showed that there was a very good agreement between them, with a low mean difference of 0.84 liters/minute (95% CI: -38.68 to 40.38 liters/minute) and 94.0%, which were within LOA. Conclusions The accuracy of PRAAN is in the agreement with spirometry and the mini-Wright peak flow meter. The clinical application of PRAAN may potentially lead to a monitoring strategy that healthcare providers can use to improve the management of asthma.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过 PRAAN、肺活量测定法和微型莱特峰值流量计测量呼气峰值流量的准确性对比研究

背景 PRAAN 是一种数字式峰值流量计，用于测量呼气峰值流速 (PEFR)，以监测哮喘。本研究旨在比较 PRAAN 与肺活量法和迷你赖特峰值流量计测量 PEFR 的准确性。方法对 106 名健康成人参与者进行了两项横断面研究。研究 A（n=56）将 PRAAN 与肺活量测定法进行了比较，而研究 B（n=50）则将 PRAAN 与迷你赖特峰值流量计进行了比较。通过交叉研究收集了 PEFR 值。皮尔逊相关图和布兰德-阿尔特曼图分别用于报告两种测量方法之间的关系和一致性。结果在研究 A 中，51.8% 为女性，平均年龄为 24.3±5.6 岁，PEFR 为 480.3±86.8 L/min。通过 PRAAN 测得的 PEFR 与肺活量测量值呈极强的正相关（r=0.980，P<0.001）。Bland-Altman分析表明，两者之间的一致性很好，平均差值较低，为-7.07升/分钟（95% CI：-40.58至26.44升/分钟），92.9%的差值在一致性（LOA）范围内。在研究 B 中，54.0% 为女性，平均年龄为（23.5±2.4）岁，PEFR 为（495.1±82.7）升/分钟。通过 PRAAN 和迷你莱特峰值流量计测量的 PEFR 显示出非常强的正相关性（r=0.971，P<0.001）。这两种测量方法的 PEFR 的 Bland-Altman 比较显示，它们之间的一致性非常好，平均差为 0.84 升/分钟（95% CI：-38.68 至 40.38 升/分钟），差值在 LOA 范围内的比例为 94.0%。结论 PRAAN 的准确性与肺活量测定法和迷你莱特峰值流量计一致。PRAAN 的临床应用有可能为医护人员提供一种监测策略，用于改善哮喘的管理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

1646

审稿时长

1 weeks

期刊介绍： F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格