Grammatical Evidence for the Present Tense in Sahih Al-Bukhari (a descriptive and analytical study)

Dr.Aref Abduh Salim AL- Kaladi
{"title":"Grammatical Evidence for the Present Tense in Sahih Al-Bukhari (a descriptive and analytical study)","authors":"Dr.Aref Abduh Salim AL- Kaladi","doi":"10.20428/jss.v30i2.2403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research focused on evidence in Sahih al-Bukhari that deviates from the well-known rule in the grammar of the present tense verb. After identifying these texts that contain grammatical problems, the research explained the grammatical issue and then compared the problematic wording in the hadith to the wording of other hadiths that share the same meaning and the same chain of narration. The research concluded that this evidence is not the words of the Prophet Muhammad or his companions, as the narrators of the hadiths were more concerned with the meaning than the wording. However, the research supported Ibn Malik's approach of relying on these hadiths that deviate from the well-known grammatical rule, based on the views of contemporary linguists on the philosophy of language and its flexible nature. This is what Ibn Malik was pointing to when he went beyond normative grammar to descriptive grammar. The research also discussed some of the ideas of contemporary scholars on the subject of fundamentals of audio grammar and the use of the present tense verb rules. It recommended reconsidering its traditional rules, especially for verbs that include a vowel letter and verbs that are followed by the “Noon” letter, known as the five examples.","PeriodicalId":34495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Studies","volume":"57 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v30i2.2403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research focused on evidence in Sahih al-Bukhari that deviates from the well-known rule in the grammar of the present tense verb. After identifying these texts that contain grammatical problems, the research explained the grammatical issue and then compared the problematic wording in the hadith to the wording of other hadiths that share the same meaning and the same chain of narration. The research concluded that this evidence is not the words of the Prophet Muhammad or his companions, as the narrators of the hadiths were more concerned with the meaning than the wording. However, the research supported Ibn Malik's approach of relying on these hadiths that deviate from the well-known grammatical rule, based on the views of contemporary linguists on the philosophy of language and its flexible nature. This is what Ibn Malik was pointing to when he went beyond normative grammar to descriptive grammar. The research also discussed some of the ideas of contemporary scholars on the subject of fundamentals of audio grammar and the use of the present tense verb rules. It recommended reconsidering its traditional rules, especially for verbs that include a vowel letter and verbs that are followed by the “Noon” letter, known as the five examples.
布哈里圣训》中现在时的语法证据(描述性和分析性研究)
研究重点是《布哈里圣训集》中偏离现在时动词语法中众所周知规则的证据。在确定了这些存在语法问题的文本后,研究人员解释了语法问题,然后将圣训中存在问题的措辞与具有相同含义和相同叙述链的其他圣训的措辞进行了比较。研究得出的结论是,这些证据并非先知穆罕默德或其同伴的话,因为圣训的传述者更关注意义而非措辞。不过,研究支持伊本-马利克的做法,即根据当代语言学家对语言哲学及其灵活性的看法,依赖这些偏离众所周知的语法规则的圣训。这正是伊本-马利克超越规范语法而转向描述语法的指向。研究还讨论了当代学者关于有声语法基础和现在时动词规则使用的一些观点。它建议重新考虑其传统规则,尤其是包含元音字母的动词和后面有 "Noon "字母的动词,即所谓的五个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信