Carmen González Enguita, María Garranzo García-Ibarrola, Jaime Jorge Tufet I Jaumont, H. Garde García, R. González López, L. M. Quintana Franco, G. T. Torres Zambrano, M. García-Arranz
{"title":"Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Status and Future Proposals","authors":"Carmen González Enguita, María Garranzo García-Ibarrola, Jaime Jorge Tufet I Jaumont, H. Garde García, R. González López, L. M. Quintana Franco, G. T. Torres Zambrano, M. García-Arranz","doi":"10.3390/life14070861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition with a significant impact on the quality of life of female patients. The limitations of current treatment strategies have prompted the exploration of new effective and minimally invasive alternative approaches, including cell therapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted to update the current clinical status of stem cell therapy in the management of female stress urinary incontinence. Results: Over thirty clinical studies have been designed to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of cell therapy for female SUI. Despite differences in cell types and protocols, the overall treatment procedures were similar. Standard subjective and objective assessment tools, and follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 6 years have been used. Cell injection has shown to be a safe therapy in the treatment of female SUI. However, the results from more recent randomized trials have shown less promising results than expected in restoring continence. Heterogeneous research methodologies using different cell types and doses make it difficult to draw conclusions about effectiveness. Several key points remain that need to be further explored in future clinical trials. Conclusion: To advance in the development of cell therapy, it is essential to know the mechanisms involved to be able to direct it properly, its efficacy and the durability of the injected cells. Rigorous and homogenized preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate its scope and improve its application are necessary for validation in the treatment of female SUI.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition with a significant impact on the quality of life of female patients. The limitations of current treatment strategies have prompted the exploration of new effective and minimally invasive alternative approaches, including cell therapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted to update the current clinical status of stem cell therapy in the management of female stress urinary incontinence. Results: Over thirty clinical studies have been designed to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of cell therapy for female SUI. Despite differences in cell types and protocols, the overall treatment procedures were similar. Standard subjective and objective assessment tools, and follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 6 years have been used. Cell injection has shown to be a safe therapy in the treatment of female SUI. However, the results from more recent randomized trials have shown less promising results than expected in restoring continence. Heterogeneous research methodologies using different cell types and doses make it difficult to draw conclusions about effectiveness. Several key points remain that need to be further explored in future clinical trials. Conclusion: To advance in the development of cell therapy, it is essential to know the mechanisms involved to be able to direct it properly, its efficacy and the durability of the injected cells. Rigorous and homogenized preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate its scope and improve its application are necessary for validation in the treatment of female SUI.
背景:压力性尿失禁(SUI)是一种常见病,对女性患者的生活质量有很大影响。目前治疗策略的局限性促使人们探索新的有效、微创的替代方法,包括细胞疗法。方法:通过文献检索,更新干细胞疗法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的临床现状。结果:已有30多项临床研究旨在评估细胞疗法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的可行性、安全性和有效性。尽管细胞类型和方案不同,但总体治疗程序相似。研究采用了标准的主观和客观评估工具,随访时间从 6 周到 6 年不等。细胞注射已被证明是治疗女性 SUI 的一种安全疗法。然而,最近的随机试验结果表明,在恢复尿失禁方面的效果不如预期。使用不同细胞类型和剂量的研究方法各不相同,因此很难就有效性得出结论。仍有几个关键点需要在未来的临床试验中进一步探讨。结论:要推动细胞疗法的发展,就必须了解细胞疗法的相关机制,以便能够正确地指导细胞疗法、其疗效和注射细胞的持久性。为验证细胞疗法在女性 SUI 治疗中的有效性,有必要开展严格、同质化的临床前和临床研究,以证明细胞疗法的适用范围并提高其应用水平。