Analysis of a Newly Developed Afterburner System Employing Hydrogen–Methane Blends

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
F. Florean, A. Mangra, Marius Enache, R. Carlanescu, Alexandra Taranu, Madalina Botu
{"title":"Analysis of a Newly Developed Afterburner System Employing Hydrogen–Methane Blends","authors":"F. Florean, A. Mangra, Marius Enache, R. Carlanescu, Alexandra Taranu, Madalina Botu","doi":"10.3390/inventions9040074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A considerable number of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems continue to depend on fossil fuels like oil and natural gas, contributing to significant environmental pollution and the release of greenhouse gases. Two V-gutter flame holder prototypes (P1 and P2) with the same expansion angle, fueled with pure hydrogen (100% H2) or hydrogen–methane mixtures (60% H2 + 40% CH4, 80% H2 + 20% CH4), intended for use in cogeneration applications, have been designed, manufactured, and tested. Throughout the tests, the concentrations of CO2, CO, and NO in the flue gas were monitored, and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed. The CO, CO2, respectively, and NO emissions gradually decreased as the percentage of H2 in the fuel mixture increased. The NO emissions were significantly lower in the case of prototype P2 in comparison with prototype P1 in all measurement points for all used fuel mixtures. The shortest recirculation zone was observed for P1, where the axial velocity reaches a negative peak of approximately 12 m/s at roughly 50 mm downstream of the edge of the flame holder, and the recirculation region spans about 90 mm. In comparison, the P2 prototype has a length of the recirculation region span of about 100 mm with a negative peak of approximately 14 m/s. The data reveal high gradients in flow velocity near the flow separation point, which gradually smooth out with increasing downstream distance. Despite their similar design, P2 consistently performs better across all measured velocity components. This improvement can be attributed to the larger fuel injection holes, which enhance fuel–air mixing and combustion stability. Additionally, the presence of side walls directing the flow around the flame stabilizer further aids in maintaining a stable combustion process.","PeriodicalId":14564,"journal":{"name":"Inventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions9040074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A considerable number of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems continue to depend on fossil fuels like oil and natural gas, contributing to significant environmental pollution and the release of greenhouse gases. Two V-gutter flame holder prototypes (P1 and P2) with the same expansion angle, fueled with pure hydrogen (100% H2) or hydrogen–methane mixtures (60% H2 + 40% CH4, 80% H2 + 20% CH4), intended for use in cogeneration applications, have been designed, manufactured, and tested. Throughout the tests, the concentrations of CO2, CO, and NO in the flue gas were monitored, and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed. The CO, CO2, respectively, and NO emissions gradually decreased as the percentage of H2 in the fuel mixture increased. The NO emissions were significantly lower in the case of prototype P2 in comparison with prototype P1 in all measurement points for all used fuel mixtures. The shortest recirculation zone was observed for P1, where the axial velocity reaches a negative peak of approximately 12 m/s at roughly 50 mm downstream of the edge of the flame holder, and the recirculation region spans about 90 mm. In comparison, the P2 prototype has a length of the recirculation region span of about 100 mm with a negative peak of approximately 14 m/s. The data reveal high gradients in flow velocity near the flow separation point, which gradually smooth out with increasing downstream distance. Despite their similar design, P2 consistently performs better across all measured velocity components. This improvement can be attributed to the larger fuel injection holes, which enhance fuel–air mixing and combustion stability. Additionally, the presence of side walls directing the flow around the flame stabilizer further aids in maintaining a stable combustion process.
采用氢气-甲烷混合物的新型后燃烧器系统分析
相当多的热电联产(CHP)系统仍然依赖石油和天然气等化石燃料,造成了严重的环境污染和温室气体排放。我们设计、制造并测试了两个具有相同膨胀角的 V 型沟槽焰座原型(P1 和 P2),其燃料为纯氢(100% H2)或氢甲烷混合物(60% H2 + 40% CH4、80% H2 + 20% CH4),用于热电联产应用。在整个测试过程中,对烟气中的 CO2、CO 和 NO 的浓度进行了监测,并进行了粒子图像测速(PIV)测量。随着燃料混合物中 H2 所占比例的增加,CO、CO2 和 NO 的排放量逐渐减少。与原型 P1 相比,原型 P2 在所有测量点的所有燃料混合物中的 NO 排放量都明显降低。P1 的再循环区最短,在火焰架边缘下游约 50 毫米处,轴向速度达到约 12 米/秒的负峰值,再循环区跨度约为 90 毫米。相比之下,P2 原型的再循环区域跨度约为 100 毫米,负峰值约为 14 米/秒。数据显示,分流点附近的流速梯度较大,随着下游距离的增加,梯度逐渐趋于平稳。尽管设计相似,但 P2 在所有测得的速度成分中始终表现更佳。这种改进可归功于较大的燃料喷射孔,它增强了燃料与空气的混合和燃烧稳定性。此外,火焰稳定器周围的侧壁还能引导气流,进一步帮助保持稳定的燃烧过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inventions
Inventions Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
91
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信