Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces

Chris Dent
{"title":"Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces","authors":"Chris Dent","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v43i2.8377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace deaths occur as a result of decisions made by a range of parties — employers, employees and the victim. These decisions can be seen to form the basis of regulatory efforts. This research proposes a categorisation of the decisions in terms of their timeframes — long-term, short-term and emergency — as well as non-decisions. The decisions will be explored through the use of decision-making theory, an engagement with the ‘agency-systems’ dichotomy, the conflict between the underlying policies of safety, efficiency and devolved decision-making, as well the concept of ‘resilience engineering’. By way of contrast, there will be reference to the regulation of iatrogenic deaths to further probe the value of the approach. The outcome is a call for a focus on the regulation of decisions, and a step away from the traditional focus on fatalities as outcomes.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"118 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v43i2.8377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace deaths occur as a result of decisions made by a range of parties — employers, employees and the victim. These decisions can be seen to form the basis of regulatory efforts. This research proposes a categorisation of the decisions in terms of their timeframes — long-term, short-term and emergency — as well as non-decisions. The decisions will be explored through the use of decision-making theory, an engagement with the ‘agency-systems’ dichotomy, the conflict between the underlying policies of safety, efficiency and devolved decision-making, as well the concept of ‘resilience engineering’. By way of contrast, there will be reference to the regulation of iatrogenic deaths to further probe the value of the approach. The outcome is a call for a focus on the regulation of decisions, and a step away from the traditional focus on fatalities as outcomes.
规范导致工作场所丧生的决策
工作场所死亡事故的发生是雇主、雇员和受害者等多方决定的结果。这些决定可以被视为监管工作的基础。本研究建议从时间框架(长期、短期和紧急)以及非决策的角度对决策进行分类。我们将通过决策理论、"机构-系统 "二分法、安全、效率和决策权下放等基本政策之间的冲突以及 "复原力工程 "的概念来探讨这些决策。与此形成对比的是,还将参考对先天性死亡的监管,以进一步探究该方法的价值。其结果是呼吁将重点放在对决策的监管上,并摆脱将死亡作为结果的传统做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信