The Effects of Language Policy on Minority Languages

Peter Smith
{"title":"The Effects of Language Policy on Minority Languages","authors":"Peter Smith","doi":"10.47941/ejl.2054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effects of language policy on minority languages. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to language policy on minority languages. Preliminary empirical review revealed that supportive and well-implemented language policies significantly contributed to the preservation and revitalization of minority languages. It found that bilingual education programs and media representation were crucial for maintaining linguistic diversity, but their success depended on adequate resources, trained educators, and community involvement. The study also emphasized the importance of community-driven policies, advocating for a bottom-up approach to ensure cultural sensitivity and sustainability. Overall, the research highlighted the need for comprehensive and inclusive language policies to protect and promote minority languages. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Linguistic Relativity Theory, Language Ecology Theory and Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effects of language policy on minority languages. The study recommended integrating sociolinguistic and ecological perspectives into theoretical frameworks, enhancing bilingual and multilingual education, and utilizing modern technology for language preservation. It emphasized robust legislative frameworks to support minority languages, continuous policy evaluation, and active community involvement in language planning. The study also suggested incorporating minority languages into economic and social spheres, promoting international cooperation, and including language preservation in global cultural agendas. These recommendations aimed to advance theory, practice, and policy for better preservation and revitalization of minority languages.","PeriodicalId":512607,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Linguistics","volume":"128 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.2054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effects of language policy on minority languages. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to language policy on minority languages. Preliminary empirical review revealed that supportive and well-implemented language policies significantly contributed to the preservation and revitalization of minority languages. It found that bilingual education programs and media representation were crucial for maintaining linguistic diversity, but their success depended on adequate resources, trained educators, and community involvement. The study also emphasized the importance of community-driven policies, advocating for a bottom-up approach to ensure cultural sensitivity and sustainability. Overall, the research highlighted the need for comprehensive and inclusive language policies to protect and promote minority languages. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Linguistic Relativity Theory, Language Ecology Theory and Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effects of language policy on minority languages. The study recommended integrating sociolinguistic and ecological perspectives into theoretical frameworks, enhancing bilingual and multilingual education, and utilizing modern technology for language preservation. It emphasized robust legislative frameworks to support minority languages, continuous policy evaluation, and active community involvement in language planning. The study also suggested incorporating minority languages into economic and social spheres, promoting international cooperation, and including language preservation in global cultural agendas. These recommendations aimed to advance theory, practice, and policy for better preservation and revitalization of minority languages.
语言政策对少数民族语言的影响
目的:本研究的总体目标是调查语言政策对少数民族语言的影响。研究方法:本研究采用了案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此,与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在少数民族语言的语言政策方面存在着背景和方法上的差距。初步的实证审查显示,支持性的、实施良好的语言政策极大地促进了少数民族语言的保护和振兴。研究发现,双语教育计划和媒体代表对于保持语言多样性至关重要,但其成功与否取决于充足的资源、训练有素的教育工作者和社区参与。研究还强调了社区驱动政策的重要性,提倡采用自下而上的方法来确保文化敏感性和可持续性。总之,这项研究强调了制定全面、包容的语言政策以保护和促进少数民族语言的必要性。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:语言相对性理论、语言生态学理论和民族语言活力理论可用于今后关于语言政策对少数民族语言影响的研究。研究建议将社会语言学和生态学观点纳入理论框架,加强双语和多语教育,利用现代技术保护语言。研究强调了支持少数民族语言的强有力的立法框架、持续的政策评估以及社区对语言规划的积极参与。研究还建议将少数民族语言纳入经济和社会领域,促进国际合作,并将语言保护纳入全球文化议程。这些建议旨在推进理论、实践和政策,以更好地保护和振兴少数民族语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信