Language and Identity: Code-Switching Practices among Multilingual Communities

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to analyze code switching practices among multilateral communities. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to language and identity. Preliminary empirical review revealed that code-switching was a strategic tool for navigating and negotiating identities. It highlighted the practice's role in maintaining cultural heritage, aiding social integration, and enhancing professional advancement. The study emphasized the importance of code-switching in preserving linguistic traditions and managing social relationships. It concluded by recommending more inclusive language policies and educational practices that recognize the value of code-switching as a legitimate communicative practice. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Identity Theory, Communication Accommodation Theory and Ethnolinguistic Identity Theory may be used to anchor future studies on language and identity. The study recommended integrating Social Identity Theory with Communication Accommodation Theory for a holistic understanding of code-switching and suggested developing a new model to address language and identity interplay. In education, it advocated for translanguaging pedagogies and training for teachers to support multilingual students. In professional settings, it advised fostering language-inclusive environments and training programs to enhance linguistic awareness. Policy recommendations included implementing language policies that support multilingualism and linguistic rights. The study also emphasized promoting social integration through community programs and identified future research directions to further explore the relationship between language and identity.