An Analysis of Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle’s Theological Perspective on Homosexuality: Balancing Affection and Ethical Concerns

Abstract

Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle is recognized as a leading scholar in Islamic studies, significantly contributing to the understanding of gender and sexuality within the framework of social justice, particularly in the discourse on homosexuality and Islamic ideology. His findings have sparked considerable debate and controversy. This paper presents a comprehensive critical analysis of Kugle’s arguments regarding homosexuality in Islam, evaluating the accuracy of the texts and contexts he employs. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study analyzes religious texts and secondary literature. Primary sources include the Qur’an, hadith, and classical tafsir, while secondary sources encompass Kugle’s works and related supportive or critical literature. The analysis reveals that Kugle’s works often exhibit selectivity, disregarding well-established traditional views, and are influenced by biases and assumptions. This critique advocates for a more contextual and holistic approach to understanding homosexuality in Islam, aiming to foster academic discourse that provides a fuller perspective