Determination of relative bioavailability of copper from copper glycinate in growing beef steers

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Jacob A Henderson, Emma K Niedermayer-Conway, Stephanie L. Hansen
{"title":"Determination of relative bioavailability of copper from copper glycinate in growing beef steers","authors":"Jacob A Henderson, Emma K Niedermayer-Conway, Stephanie L. Hansen","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chelated copper (Cu) sources, such as Cu glycinate (CuGly), may be more bioavailable relative to Cu sulfate (CuSO4) when fed to ruminants under antagonistic pressure. The objective of this study was to determine the bioavailability of CuGly (GemStone Cu; Phibro Animal Health) relative to CuSO4 in steers fed a diet supplemented with 0.3% sulfur and 2 mg molybdenum/kg of dry matter (DM). Sixty Angus crossbred steers (n = 12 per treatment) averaging 288 ± 4.85 kg were enrolled in a 90-day study and fed a corn silage-based diet with one of five Cu supplementation strategies, including: no supplemental Cu (CON), 5 or 10 mg supplemental Cu from CuSO4/kg DM, and 5 or 10 mg supplemental Cu from CuGly/kg DM. Steers were housed in pens equipped with GrowSafe feed bunks (GrowSafe Systems Ltd., Airdire, AB, Canada), with six steers per pen. Growth performance, liver Cu, and plasma Cu were analyzed in the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc, Cary, NC) with orthogonal contrasts to compare CON vs. 5 mg Cu/kg DM, CON vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM, 5 vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM, and CuSO4 vs. CuGly. Copper indices were regressed against Cu intake and slopes calculated using the GLM procedure SAS. Dietary Cu supplementation did not affect steer body weights on d 0, 28, 56, or 90 (P ≥ 0.52), average daily gain, dry matter intake, or gain:feed (P ≥ 0.36). Final plasma Cu concentration did not differ between CON vs. 5 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.79), CON vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.65), or 5 vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.39). Steers receiving CuSO4 tended to have greater final plasma Cu concentrations than those receiving CuGly (P = 0.08). Initial liver Cu concentration averaged 374 mg Cu/kg DM, which is considered highly adequate. No steers reached deficient Cu status by the end of the 90-day period. Control steers had lesser final liver Cu concentrations than supplemented steers (P ≤ 0.04). Steers receiving 10 mg supplemental Cu/kg DM had greater liver Cu concentrations than those receiving 5 mg supplemental Cu/kg DM (P = 0.01). Copper source had no effect on final liver Cu concentrations (P = 0.57) and based on liver Cu and Cu intake the bioavailability of CuGly was similar to CuSO4 (115%; P = 0.27). The initially high Cu status and the fact that cattle did not become Cu deficient may have impacted the relative bioavailability results, and more research is needed to investigate the role initial Cu status and antagonistic pressure play in the bioavailability of chelated Cu sources.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chelated copper (Cu) sources, such as Cu glycinate (CuGly), may be more bioavailable relative to Cu sulfate (CuSO4) when fed to ruminants under antagonistic pressure. The objective of this study was to determine the bioavailability of CuGly (GemStone Cu; Phibro Animal Health) relative to CuSO4 in steers fed a diet supplemented with 0.3% sulfur and 2 mg molybdenum/kg of dry matter (DM). Sixty Angus crossbred steers (n = 12 per treatment) averaging 288 ± 4.85 kg were enrolled in a 90-day study and fed a corn silage-based diet with one of five Cu supplementation strategies, including: no supplemental Cu (CON), 5 or 10 mg supplemental Cu from CuSO4/kg DM, and 5 or 10 mg supplemental Cu from CuGly/kg DM. Steers were housed in pens equipped with GrowSafe feed bunks (GrowSafe Systems Ltd., Airdire, AB, Canada), with six steers per pen. Growth performance, liver Cu, and plasma Cu were analyzed in the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc, Cary, NC) with orthogonal contrasts to compare CON vs. 5 mg Cu/kg DM, CON vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM, 5 vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM, and CuSO4 vs. CuGly. Copper indices were regressed against Cu intake and slopes calculated using the GLM procedure SAS. Dietary Cu supplementation did not affect steer body weights on d 0, 28, 56, or 90 (P ≥ 0.52), average daily gain, dry matter intake, or gain:feed (P ≥ 0.36). Final plasma Cu concentration did not differ between CON vs. 5 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.79), CON vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.65), or 5 vs. 10 mg Cu/kg DM (P = 0.39). Steers receiving CuSO4 tended to have greater final plasma Cu concentrations than those receiving CuGly (P = 0.08). Initial liver Cu concentration averaged 374 mg Cu/kg DM, which is considered highly adequate. No steers reached deficient Cu status by the end of the 90-day period. Control steers had lesser final liver Cu concentrations than supplemented steers (P ≤ 0.04). Steers receiving 10 mg supplemental Cu/kg DM had greater liver Cu concentrations than those receiving 5 mg supplemental Cu/kg DM (P = 0.01). Copper source had no effect on final liver Cu concentrations (P = 0.57) and based on liver Cu and Cu intake the bioavailability of CuGly was similar to CuSO4 (115%; P = 0.27). The initially high Cu status and the fact that cattle did not become Cu deficient may have impacted the relative bioavailability results, and more research is needed to investigate the role initial Cu status and antagonistic pressure play in the bioavailability of chelated Cu sources.
测定甘氨酸铜在生长肉牛体内的相对生物利用率
螯合铜(Cu)来源,如甘氨酸铜(CuGly),与硫酸铜(CuSO4)相比,在拮抗压力下饲喂反刍动物时的生物利用率可能更高。本研究的目的是确定 CuGly(GemStone Cu;Phibro Animal Health)相对于硫酸铜(CuSO4)的生物利用率。60 头平均体重为 288 ± 4.85 千克的安格斯杂交母牛(n = 12 头/每种处理)参加了一项为期 90 天的研究,饲喂以玉米青贮为主的日粮,并采用五种补充铜策略中的一种,包括:不补充铜(CON)、从 CuSO4 中补充 5 或 10 毫克铜/千克 DM,以及从 CuGly 中补充 5 或 10 毫克铜/千克 DM。阉牛饲养在配有 GrowSafe 饲料铺的圈舍中(GrowSafe Systems Ltd., Airdire, AB, Canada),每个圈舍饲养六头阉牛。使用 SAS 9.4(SAS Inst. Inc, Cary, NC)的 MIXED 程序对生长性能、肝铜和血浆铜进行分析,并使用正交对比法比较 CON 与 5 mg Cu/kg DM、CON 与 10 mg Cu/kg DM、5 mg Cu/kg DM 与 10 mg Cu/kg DM 以及 CuSO4 与 CuGly。铜指数与铜摄入量进行回归,并使用 GLM 程序 SAS 计算斜率。日粮中补充铜不会影响第 0、28、56 或 90 天的体重(P ≥ 0.52)、平均日增重、干物质摄入量或增重:饲料(P ≥ 0.36)。最终血浆铜浓度在 CON 与 5 mg Cu/kg DM(P = 0.79)、CON 与 10 mg Cu/kg DM(P = 0.65)或 5 mg Cu/kg DM 与 10 mg Cu/kg DM(P = 0.39)之间没有差异。与接受 CuGly 的牛相比,接受 CuSO4 的牛的最终血浆铜浓度往往更高(P = 0.08)。初始肝脏铜浓度平均为 374 毫克铜/千克 DM,这被认为是非常充足的。在 90 天结束时,没有一头母牛达到缺铜状态。对照组母牛的最终肝脏铜浓度低于补充组母牛(P ≤ 0.04)。补充 10 毫克铜/千克 DM 的阉牛的肝脏铜浓度高于补充 5 毫克铜/千克 DM 的阉牛(P = 0.01)。铜源对最终肝脏铜浓度没有影响(P = 0.57),根据肝脏铜和铜摄入量,CuGly 的生物利用率与 CuSO4 相似(115%;P = 0.27)。最初的高铜状态和牛没有出现铜缺乏的事实可能会影响相对生物利用率的结果,因此需要进行更多的研究来探讨最初的铜状态和拮抗压力在螯合铜源的生物利用率中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信