F. Poursoltani, M. Behmadi, M. Keshtkar, M. Ghorbani, F. Paknazar, P. Hejazi
{"title":"Evaluation of Barium sulfate-copper breast radiation shield for use in thoracic Computed Tomography Examinations","authors":"F. Poursoltani, M. Behmadi, M. Keshtkar, M. Ghorbani, F. Paknazar, P. Hejazi","doi":"10.1051/radiopro/2024025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In thoracic computed tomography (CT) examinations, patients' breasts are exposed to high radiation doses, necessitating the need to reduce the received dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a new composition of a shielding material with minimal impact on image quality. Materials and methods: Different breast shields were manufactured with varying weight percentages of copper and BaSO4. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and thorax phantoms were used to assess the radiation shielding effectiveness. Image quality, in terms of noise and CT number accuracy, was quantitatively evaluated on a CTDI phantom. Additionally, a controlled trial with 60 female participants was conducted to further assess image quality and select the best breast radiation shield. Results: The results indicated that the different shield compositions reduced the surface dose by 14.17-51.69%. The shield with a composition of 90% Cu-10% BaSO4 and 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 had the lowest noise, while the 100% bismuth shield had the highest noise. Importantly, the 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 shield did not cause artifacts in the thoracic CT images. Conclusion: By using the 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 shield, a significant dose reduction was achieved while maintaining appropriate image quality, making it suitable for clinical applications.","PeriodicalId":21009,"journal":{"name":"Radioprotection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioprotection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In thoracic computed tomography (CT) examinations, patients' breasts are exposed to high radiation doses, necessitating the need to reduce the received dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a new composition of a shielding material with minimal impact on image quality. Materials and methods: Different breast shields were manufactured with varying weight percentages of copper and BaSO4. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and thorax phantoms were used to assess the radiation shielding effectiveness. Image quality, in terms of noise and CT number accuracy, was quantitatively evaluated on a CTDI phantom. Additionally, a controlled trial with 60 female participants was conducted to further assess image quality and select the best breast radiation shield. Results: The results indicated that the different shield compositions reduced the surface dose by 14.17-51.69%. The shield with a composition of 90% Cu-10% BaSO4 and 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 had the lowest noise, while the 100% bismuth shield had the highest noise. Importantly, the 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 shield did not cause artifacts in the thoracic CT images. Conclusion: By using the 50% Cu-50% BaSO4 shield, a significant dose reduction was achieved while maintaining appropriate image quality, making it suitable for clinical applications.
RadioprotectionENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
54.50%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Radioprotection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes (theoretical and practical aspects): dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments.