A new approach: preventive protocols with yeast products and essential oils can reduce the in-feed use of antibiotics in growing-finishing pigs

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ygor Henrique De Paula, Maíra Resende, R. Chaves, J. A. Barbosa, C. Garbossa, Matheus de Oliveira Costa, Fernanda Rigo, Robson Sfaciotti Barducci, Anderson Aparecido Dias Santos, Leticia Graziele Pacheco, T. Putarov, Vinícius de Souza Cantarelli
{"title":"A new approach: preventive protocols with yeast products and essential oils can reduce the in-feed use of antibiotics in growing-finishing pigs","authors":"Ygor Henrique De Paula, Maíra Resende, R. Chaves, J. A. Barbosa, C. Garbossa, Matheus de Oliveira Costa, Fernanda Rigo, Robson Sfaciotti Barducci, Anderson Aparecido Dias Santos, Leticia Graziele Pacheco, T. Putarov, Vinícius de Souza Cantarelli","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of yeast products (YP) and essential oils (EO) in total or partial replacement to in-feed antibiotic protocols (growth promoter and prophylactic), both in recommended doses and in overdose of prophylactic antibiotics, on growth performance, and diarrhea incidence in the growing-finishing pigs; and fecal microbiota in market hogs. Four hundred pigs (20.36 ± 2.64 kg) were assigned to five treatments in a randomized block design: diets with prophylactic and growth promoter antibiotics (ANT); ANT with 30% more prophylactic antibiotics (ANT+30); diets with less prophylactic antibiotics and YP (ANT+Y); diets with less prophylactic antibiotics, YP and EO (ANT+Y+EO); and antibiotics free diets with YP and EO (Y+EO). The content of the active components of the yeast products was 60% purified β-1,3/1,6-glucans extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast (Macrogard®), 20% functional water-soluble MOS (HyperGen®), and 18% MOS, extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast (ActiveMOS®). From 0 to 14d, pigs of the ANT+30, ANT+Y, and ANT+Y+EO treatments showed a greater body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) compared to pigs from the Y+EO group. From 14 to 35d, pigs of ANT+30 and ANT+Y+EO treatments were heavier than Y+EO group. At 105d, ANT pigs had a higher BW than the Y+EO group. For the entire period, ADG of ANT pigs were greater and feed conversion ratio (FCR) better than Y+EO pigs. From 0 to 35d, pigs of the Y+EO treatment showed a higher diarrhea incidence compared to pigs of the other groups. From 49 to 70d, ANT+Y and ANT+Y+EO treatments showed a lower diarrhea incidence than Y+EO group, which remained the case during the overall period. At 105d, the alpha diversity of fecal microbiota by Shannon Entropy were lower in ANT, ANT+30 and Y+EO groups than observed for ANT+Y+EO group. Abundance of Firmicutes phylum and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio were higher in ANT than in ANT+Y+EO pigs. Proteobacteria phylum abundance in ANT+Y+EO was higher than ANT, ANT+Y, and Y+EO. Peptostreptococcaceae family abundance was higher in ANT, ANT+30, and ANT+Y groups than in ANT+Y+EO and Y+EO groups. ANT+Y+EO and Y+EO groups show a lower abundance of SMB53 genus than ANT and ANT+30 groups. In conclusion, the use of YP and EO, in partial replacement to the in-feed antibiotic protocols, does not reduce the growth performance, can replace antibiotic growth promotors, and reduce the in-feed use of prophylactic antibiotics in growing-finishing pigs. The use of YP and EO, together with prophylactic antibiotics, increase the microbial diversity, despite having important genera for weight gain in less abundance. Overdose of prophylactic antibiotics does not improve growth performance and reduces microbial diversity, which does not characterize it as an efficient preventive protocol.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of yeast products (YP) and essential oils (EO) in total or partial replacement to in-feed antibiotic protocols (growth promoter and prophylactic), both in recommended doses and in overdose of prophylactic antibiotics, on growth performance, and diarrhea incidence in the growing-finishing pigs; and fecal microbiota in market hogs. Four hundred pigs (20.36 ± 2.64 kg) were assigned to five treatments in a randomized block design: diets with prophylactic and growth promoter antibiotics (ANT); ANT with 30% more prophylactic antibiotics (ANT+30); diets with less prophylactic antibiotics and YP (ANT+Y); diets with less prophylactic antibiotics, YP and EO (ANT+Y+EO); and antibiotics free diets with YP and EO (Y+EO). The content of the active components of the yeast products was 60% purified β-1,3/1,6-glucans extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast (Macrogard®), 20% functional water-soluble MOS (HyperGen®), and 18% MOS, extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast (ActiveMOS®). From 0 to 14d, pigs of the ANT+30, ANT+Y, and ANT+Y+EO treatments showed a greater body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) compared to pigs from the Y+EO group. From 14 to 35d, pigs of ANT+30 and ANT+Y+EO treatments were heavier than Y+EO group. At 105d, ANT pigs had a higher BW than the Y+EO group. For the entire period, ADG of ANT pigs were greater and feed conversion ratio (FCR) better than Y+EO pigs. From 0 to 35d, pigs of the Y+EO treatment showed a higher diarrhea incidence compared to pigs of the other groups. From 49 to 70d, ANT+Y and ANT+Y+EO treatments showed a lower diarrhea incidence than Y+EO group, which remained the case during the overall period. At 105d, the alpha diversity of fecal microbiota by Shannon Entropy were lower in ANT, ANT+30 and Y+EO groups than observed for ANT+Y+EO group. Abundance of Firmicutes phylum and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio were higher in ANT than in ANT+Y+EO pigs. Proteobacteria phylum abundance in ANT+Y+EO was higher than ANT, ANT+Y, and Y+EO. Peptostreptococcaceae family abundance was higher in ANT, ANT+30, and ANT+Y groups than in ANT+Y+EO and Y+EO groups. ANT+Y+EO and Y+EO groups show a lower abundance of SMB53 genus than ANT and ANT+30 groups. In conclusion, the use of YP and EO, in partial replacement to the in-feed antibiotic protocols, does not reduce the growth performance, can replace antibiotic growth promotors, and reduce the in-feed use of prophylactic antibiotics in growing-finishing pigs. The use of YP and EO, together with prophylactic antibiotics, increase the microbial diversity, despite having important genera for weight gain in less abundance. Overdose of prophylactic antibiotics does not improve growth performance and reduces microbial diversity, which does not characterize it as an efficient preventive protocol.
新方法:使用酵母产品和精油的预防方案可减少生长育肥猪饲料中抗生素的使用量
本研究的目的是评估酵母产品(YP)和精油(EO)完全或部分替代饲料中抗生素(促生长药和预防药)(建议剂量和过量预防性抗生素)对生长育成猪的生长性能、腹泻发生率以及市场猪粪便微生物群的影响。四百头猪(20.36 ± 2.64 kg)在随机区组设计中被分配到五个处理:含有预防性抗生素和生长促进剂抗生素的日粮(ANT);含有 30% 以上预防性抗生素的 ANT 日粮(ANT+30);含有较少预防性抗生素和 YP 的日粮(ANT+Y);含有较少预防性抗生素、YP 和 EO 的日粮(ANT+Y+EO);以及不含抗生素、YP 和 EO 的日粮(Y+EO)。酵母产品中有效成分的含量为:60%从酿酒酵母中提取的纯化β-1,3/1,6-葡聚糖(Macrogard®)、20%功能性水溶性 MOS(HyperGen®)和 18%从酿酒酵母中提取的 MOS(ActiveMOS®)。从 0 天到 14 天,ANT+30、ANT+Y 和 ANT+Y+EO 处理的猪的体重(BW)和平均日增重(ADG)均高于 Y+EO 组。从 14 天到 35 天,ANT+30 和 ANT+Y+EO 处理的猪比 Y+EO 组更重。105 d 时,ANT 组猪的体重高于 Y+EO 组。在整个期间,ANT 猪的 ADG 比 Y+EO 猪大,饲料转化率(FCR)比 Y+EO 猪高。从 0 天到 35 天,Y+EO 处理组的猪腹泻发生率高于其他组。从 49 天到 70 天,ANT+Y 和 ANT+Y+EO 处理组的腹泻发生率低于 Y+EO 组,在整个期间都是如此。105 d时,根据香农熵(Shannon Entropy)计算,ANT组、ANT+30组和Y+EO组粪便微生物群的α多样性低于ANT+Y+EO组。与 ANT+Y+EO 组相比,ANT 组猪粪微生物群中的固着菌门丰度和固着菌/类杆菌比例较高。蛋白菌门在 ANT+Y+EO 组中的丰度高于 ANT、ANT+Y 和 Y+EO。ANT、ANT+30和ANT+Y组的拟杆菌科丰度高于ANT+Y+EO和Y+EO组。ANT+Y+EO 组和 Y+EO 组的 SMB53 属丰度低于 ANT 组和 ANT+30 组。总之,使用 YP 和 EO 部分替代饲料中的抗生素方案不会降低生长性能,可以替代抗生素生长促进剂,并减少生长育成猪饲料中预防性抗生素的使用。使用 YP 和 EO 以及预防性抗生素可增加微生物的多样性,尽管对增重有重要影响的菌属数量较少。过量使用预防性抗生素并不能提高生长性能,反而会降低微生物多样性,因此并不是一种有效的预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信