A Cross-lagged Longitudinal Study of Bidirectional Associations between Meaning in Life and Academic Engagement: The Mediation of Hope

IF 2.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ying Cai, Tuo Zeng, Ruixiang Gao, Yongxing Guo, Ya Wang, Daoqun Ding
{"title":"A Cross-lagged Longitudinal Study of Bidirectional Associations between Meaning in Life and Academic Engagement: The Mediation of Hope","authors":"Ying Cai,&nbsp;Tuo Zeng,&nbsp;Ruixiang Gao,&nbsp;Yongxing Guo,&nbsp;Ya Wang,&nbsp;Daoqun Ding","doi":"10.1007/s11482-024-10348-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has established a positive correlation between meaning in life and academic achievement, yet several gaps remain unaddressed. Firstly, the directionality of their relationships is unclear, particularly the potential impact of academic engagement on life meaning. Secondly, most studies have not distinguished between the distinct dimensions of meaning in life—presence of meaning and search for meaning. Thirdly, the underlying mechanisms of these relationships are not well-understood. To address these gaps, this study conducted a six-month, two-wave longitudinal analysis involving 3,895 Chinese secondary school students. Utilizing a cross-lagged panel model, we examined the causal relationships between both dimensions of meaning in life and academic engagement, with a specific focus on the mediating role of hope. Results indicated a reciprocal relationship between presence of meaning and academic engagement, where hope acted as a positive mediator within their bidirectional causal pathways. Conversely, the relationship between the search for meaning and academic engagement was unidirectional, with academic engagement significantly and positively predicting the search for meaning via increased levels of hope, but not vice versa. The study concludes with a discussion of research implications and future research directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"19 5","pages":"2665 - 2684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-024-10348-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has established a positive correlation between meaning in life and academic achievement, yet several gaps remain unaddressed. Firstly, the directionality of their relationships is unclear, particularly the potential impact of academic engagement on life meaning. Secondly, most studies have not distinguished between the distinct dimensions of meaning in life—presence of meaning and search for meaning. Thirdly, the underlying mechanisms of these relationships are not well-understood. To address these gaps, this study conducted a six-month, two-wave longitudinal analysis involving 3,895 Chinese secondary school students. Utilizing a cross-lagged panel model, we examined the causal relationships between both dimensions of meaning in life and academic engagement, with a specific focus on the mediating role of hope. Results indicated a reciprocal relationship between presence of meaning and academic engagement, where hope acted as a positive mediator within their bidirectional causal pathways. Conversely, the relationship between the search for meaning and academic engagement was unidirectional, with academic engagement significantly and positively predicting the search for meaning via increased levels of hope, but not vice versa. The study concludes with a discussion of research implications and future research directions.

Abstract Image

人生意义与学业投入之间双向关联的跨滞后纵向研究:希望的中介作用
以往的研究已经确定了人生意义与学业成绩之间的正相关关系,但仍有几项空白未得到解决。首先,它们之间关系的方向性并不明确,尤其是学术参与对人生意义的潜在影响。其次,大多数研究没有区分人生意义的不同层面--意义的存在和意义的寻求。第三,这些关系的内在机制还不甚明了。为了弥补这些不足,本研究对 3,895 名中国中学生进行了为期六个月的两波纵向分析。利用跨滞后面板模型,我们考察了生命意义和学业投入这两个维度之间的因果关系,并特别关注了希望的中介作用。结果表明,意义的存在与学业投入之间存在互为因果的关系,希望在二者的双向因果关系中起着积极的中介作用。相反,寻找意义与学术参与之间的关系是单向的,学术参与通过希望水平的提高对寻找意义有显著的正向预测作用,但反之亦然。本研究最后讨论了研究意义和未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信