Device-assisted enteroscopy: Are we ready to dismiss the spiral?

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
A. Mussetto, E. Merola, C. Casadei, Daniele Salvi, F. Fornaroli, Silvia Cocca, M. Trebbi, Armando Gabbrielli, C. Spada, Andrea Michielan
{"title":"Device-assisted enteroscopy: Are we ready to dismiss the spiral?","authors":"A. Mussetto, E. Merola, C. Casadei, Daniele Salvi, F. Fornaroli, Silvia Cocca, M. Trebbi, Armando Gabbrielli, C. Spada, Andrea Michielan","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is the latest advance in device-assisted enteroscopy. Adverse events related to MSE were discussed in a recent large systematic review and meta-analysis and were directly compared with those of balloon enteroscopy in a case-matched study and a randomized controlled trial. Following the real-life application of MSE, an unexpected safety issue emerged regarding esophageal injury and the technique has been withdrawn from the global market, despite encouraging results in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield. We conducted an Italian multicenter real-life prospective study, which was prematurely terminated after the withdrawal of MSE from the market. The primary goals were the evaluation of MSE performance (both diagnostic and therapeutic) and its safety in routine endoscopic practice, particularly in the early phase of introduction in the endoscopic unit. A subanalysis, which involved patients who underwent MSE after unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy, demonstrated, for the first time, the promising performance of MSE as a rescue procedure. Given its remarkable performance in clinical practice and its potential role as a backup technique following a previously failed enteroscopy, it may be more appropriate to refine and enhance MSE in the future rather than completely abandoning it.","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is the latest advance in device-assisted enteroscopy. Adverse events related to MSE were discussed in a recent large systematic review and meta-analysis and were directly compared with those of balloon enteroscopy in a case-matched study and a randomized controlled trial. Following the real-life application of MSE, an unexpected safety issue emerged regarding esophageal injury and the technique has been withdrawn from the global market, despite encouraging results in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield. We conducted an Italian multicenter real-life prospective study, which was prematurely terminated after the withdrawal of MSE from the market. The primary goals were the evaluation of MSE performance (both diagnostic and therapeutic) and its safety in routine endoscopic practice, particularly in the early phase of introduction in the endoscopic unit. A subanalysis, which involved patients who underwent MSE after unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy, demonstrated, for the first time, the promising performance of MSE as a rescue procedure. Given its remarkable performance in clinical practice and its potential role as a backup technique following a previously failed enteroscopy, it may be more appropriate to refine and enhance MSE in the future rather than completely abandoning it.
设备辅助肠镜检查:我们准备好放弃螺旋检查了吗?
电动螺旋肠镜(MSE)是设备辅助肠镜的最新进展。最近的一项大型系统综述和荟萃分析讨论了与 MSE 相关的不良事件,并在一项病例匹配研究和一项随机对照试验中将 MSE 的不良事件与球囊肠镜的不良事件进行了直接比较。MSE 实际应用后,出现了食管损伤的意外安全问题,尽管在诊断和治疗效果方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但该技术已从全球市场上撤出。我们在意大利开展了一项多中心真实前瞻性研究,该研究在 MSE 退出市场后提前结束。研究的主要目的是评估 MSE 的性能(诊断和治疗)及其在常规内镜操作中的安全性,尤其是在内镜室引入 MSE 的早期阶段。一项子分析涉及在球囊肠镜检查不成功后接受 MSE 的患者,首次证明了 MSE 作为抢救程序的良好性能。鉴于 MSE 在临床实践中的出色表现及其作为之前肠镜检查失败后的备用技术的潜在作用,未来改进和提高 MSE 可能比完全放弃 MSE 更为合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信