The Met Office Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM) using a 1/12‐degree grid for global forecasts

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Ana Barbosa Aguiar, Michael J. Bell, E. Blockley, D. Calvert, Richard Crocker, G. Inverarity, Robert R. King, D. Lea, Jan Maksymczuk, Matthew J. Martin, Martin R. Price, J. Siddorn, Kerry Smout-Day, Jennifer Waters, J. While
{"title":"The Met Office Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM) using a 1/12‐degree grid for global forecasts","authors":"Ana Barbosa Aguiar, Michael J. Bell, E. Blockley, D. Calvert, Richard Crocker, G. Inverarity, Robert R. King, D. Lea, Jan Maksymczuk, Matthew J. Martin, Martin R. Price, J. Siddorn, Kerry Smout-Day, Jennifer Waters, J. While","doi":"10.1002/qj.4798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Met Office Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM) ocean–sea‐ice analysis and forecasting operational system has been using an ORCA tripolar grid with 1/4° horizontal grid spacing since December 2008. Surface boundary forcing is provided by numerical weather prediction fields from the operational global atmosphere Met Office Unified Model. We present results from a 2‐year simulation using a 1/12° global ocean–sea‐ice model configuration while keeping a 1/4° data assimilation (DA) set‐up. We also describe recent operational data assimilation enhancements that are included in our 1/4° control and 1/12° simulations: a new bias‐correction term for sea‐level anomaly assimilation and a revised pressure correction algorithm. The primary effect of the first is to decrease the mean and variability of sea‐level anomaly increments at high latitudes, whereas the second significantly reduces the vertical velocity standard deviation in the tropical Pacific. The level of improvement achieved with the higher resolution configuration is moderate but consistently satisfactory when measured using neighbourhood verification metrics that provide fairer quantitative comparisons between gridded model fields at different spatial resolutions than traditional root‐mean‐square metrics. A comparison of the eddy kinetic energy from each configuration and an observation‐based product highlights the regions where further system developments are most needed.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Met Office Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM) ocean–sea‐ice analysis and forecasting operational system has been using an ORCA tripolar grid with 1/4° horizontal grid spacing since December 2008. Surface boundary forcing is provided by numerical weather prediction fields from the operational global atmosphere Met Office Unified Model. We present results from a 2‐year simulation using a 1/12° global ocean–sea‐ice model configuration while keeping a 1/4° data assimilation (DA) set‐up. We also describe recent operational data assimilation enhancements that are included in our 1/4° control and 1/12° simulations: a new bias‐correction term for sea‐level anomaly assimilation and a revised pressure correction algorithm. The primary effect of the first is to decrease the mean and variability of sea‐level anomaly increments at high latitudes, whereas the second significantly reduces the vertical velocity standard deviation in the tropical Pacific. The level of improvement achieved with the higher resolution configuration is moderate but consistently satisfactory when measured using neighbourhood verification metrics that provide fairer quantitative comparisons between gridded model fields at different spatial resolutions than traditional root‐mean‐square metrics. A comparison of the eddy kinetic energy from each configuration and an observation‐based product highlights the regions where further system developments are most needed.
气象局预测海洋同化模型(FOAM)使用 1/12 度网格进行全球预测
气象局海洋同化模式(FOAM)海洋-海冰分析和预报业务系统自 2008 年 12 月以来一直使用水平网格间距为 1/4° 的 ORCA 三极网格。表面边界强迫由来自全球大气气象局统一模式的数值天气预报场提供。我们介绍了在保持 1/4° 数据同化(DA)设置的同时,使用 1/12° 全球海洋-海冰模型配置进行的为期两年的模拟结果。我们还介绍了 1/4°对照和 1/12°模拟中包含的最新运行数据同化增强功能:海平面异常同化的新偏差校正项和修订的压力校正算法。前者的主要作用是降低高纬度海平面异常增量的平均值和变异性,而后者则显著降低了热带太平洋的垂直速度标准偏差。与传统的均方根指标相比,邻域检验指标能对不同空间分辨率的网格模式场进行更公平的定量比较。通过比较每种配置的涡旋动能和基于观测的产品,可以发现哪些区域最需要进一步的系统开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信