Suprascapular nerve block versus intraarticular corticosteroid in the treatment of periarthritis shoulder

Avinish Kumar Singh, Chinmoy Das, P. Das, Ananta Hazarika
{"title":"Suprascapular nerve block versus intraarticular corticosteroid in the treatment of periarthritis shoulder","authors":"Avinish Kumar Singh, Chinmoy Das, P. Das, Ananta Hazarika","doi":"10.18231/j.ijor.2024.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periarthritis shoulder, Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis, presents as a significant clinical challenge with various therapeutic strategies being explored. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and intraarticular steroids, both adjunctive to physical therapy, in managing periarthritis shoulder. : We conducted a comparative study involving 50 patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder. Patients were segregated into two groups: one received SSNB (n=25), and the other received intraarticular steroids, followed by physical therapy in both groups.: Patients undergoing SSNB showed a significant reduction in SPADI scores over a 12-week follow-up period, with a mean reduction of 64%. This group also recorded patient satisfaction scores of 8.5 ± 1.2 on a VAS (0-10) and a quality of life score of 85 ± 10 on the SF-36 scale. In contrast, the intraarticular steroids group, while also showing improvement, lagged behind the SSNB group in these metrics.: SSNB, when combined with physical therapy, emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy for periarthritis shoulder, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to intraarticular steroids in terms of pain reduction, function enhancement, and patient satisfaction. Further extensive studies are warranted to affirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":483250,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijor.2024.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periarthritis shoulder, Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis, presents as a significant clinical challenge with various therapeutic strategies being explored. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and intraarticular steroids, both adjunctive to physical therapy, in managing periarthritis shoulder. : We conducted a comparative study involving 50 patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder. Patients were segregated into two groups: one received SSNB (n=25), and the other received intraarticular steroids, followed by physical therapy in both groups.: Patients undergoing SSNB showed a significant reduction in SPADI scores over a 12-week follow-up period, with a mean reduction of 64%. This group also recorded patient satisfaction scores of 8.5 ± 1.2 on a VAS (0-10) and a quality of life score of 85 ± 10 on the SF-36 scale. In contrast, the intraarticular steroids group, while also showing improvement, lagged behind the SSNB group in these metrics.: SSNB, when combined with physical therapy, emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy for periarthritis shoulder, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to intraarticular steroids in terms of pain reduction, function enhancement, and patient satisfaction. Further extensive studies are warranted to affirm these findings.
肩胛上神经阻滞与关节内皮质类固醇在肩关节周围炎治疗中的比较
肩关节周围炎、肩周炎或粘连性肩关节囊炎是一项重大的临床挑战,目前正在探索各种治疗策略。本研究旨在比较肩胛上神经阻滞疗法(SSNB)和关节内类固醇疗法在治疗肩关节周围炎方面的疗效,这两种疗法都是物理疗法的辅助疗法。 方法:我们对 50 名确诊为肩周炎的患者进行了比较研究。患者被分为两组:一组接受 SSNB(25 人),另一组接受关节内类固醇,两组患者均接受物理治疗:在为期12周的随访中,接受SSNB治疗的患者的SPADI评分显著下降,平均降幅为64%。该组患者在 VAS(0-10 分)上的满意度评分为 8.5 ± 1.2 分,在 SF-36 量表上的生活质量评分为 85 ± 10 分。相比之下,关节内类固醇组虽然也有改善,但在这些指标上落后于 SSNB 组:SSNB与物理疗法相结合,在减轻疼痛、增强功能和提高患者满意度方面的疗效优于关节内类固醇,是肩关节周围炎的一种有前途的治疗策略。为了证实这些研究结果,还需要进行更广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信