“Don’t Educate Me - Move me!” Labours of Love and Participations in the Beautiful – in art and filmmaking

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Katja Frimberger
{"title":"“Don’t Educate Me - Move me!” Labours of Love and Participations in the Beautiful – in art and filmmaking","authors":"Katja Frimberger","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores art’s (especially film’s) formative potential in two parts. In the first part, I draw on German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer and his notion of ‘education’ as it unfolds in the aesthetic appearance (Darstellung) of the cultural world – with the artwork’s coming-into-meaning as the paradigmatic example. For Gadamer, the artwork’s formative potential is bound up in its capacity to move our senses and intellect into an encounter with what is ‘other’ to our subjectivity. Drawn into a mode of paying attention to what appears (e.g. in film’s moving images), we are called to lose our-selves and be present in a new way to familiar world objects and relations. The second part of the paper imagines the ontological conditions that make possible our aesthetic hermeneutic movement in the world: the mode of the beautiful. Why do certain artworks (Gebilde) shine forth and summon us to be present to them? To pursue this question, I turn to French Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain’s notion of Beauty and craftsmanship. Maritain turns us (like Gadamer) to a Neo-Platonic notion of Beauty that is however rooted in Thomas Aquinas’ notion of the mystery of Being (i.e. God). In his reading, our hermeneutic experience of art (and, with that, our movement into self-formation in aesthetic experience) is bound up in the artist’s participation in the mode of the beautiful and her loss of self in the labour of Love of craftsmanship.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores art’s (especially film’s) formative potential in two parts. In the first part, I draw on German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer and his notion of ‘education’ as it unfolds in the aesthetic appearance (Darstellung) of the cultural world – with the artwork’s coming-into-meaning as the paradigmatic example. For Gadamer, the artwork’s formative potential is bound up in its capacity to move our senses and intellect into an encounter with what is ‘other’ to our subjectivity. Drawn into a mode of paying attention to what appears (e.g. in film’s moving images), we are called to lose our-selves and be present in a new way to familiar world objects and relations. The second part of the paper imagines the ontological conditions that make possible our aesthetic hermeneutic movement in the world: the mode of the beautiful. Why do certain artworks (Gebilde) shine forth and summon us to be present to them? To pursue this question, I turn to French Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain’s notion of Beauty and craftsmanship. Maritain turns us (like Gadamer) to a Neo-Platonic notion of Beauty that is however rooted in Thomas Aquinas’ notion of the mystery of Being (i.e. God). In his reading, our hermeneutic experience of art (and, with that, our movement into self-formation in aesthetic experience) is bound up in the artist’s participation in the mode of the beautiful and her loss of self in the labour of Love of craftsmanship.
"不要教育我--让我感动!"艺术和电影制作中的爱的劳动和美的参与
本文分两部分探讨艺术(尤其是电影)的教育潜力。在第一部分,我借鉴了德国哲学家汉斯-格奥尔格-伽达默尔(Hans-Georg Gadamer)和他的 "教育 "概念,因为 "教育 "是在文化世界的审美外观(Darstellung)中展开的--以艺术作品的 "进入意义"(coming-into-meaning)为范例。在伽达默尔看来,艺术品的教育潜能在于它能够调动我们的感官和智力,与我们的主体性 "他者 "相遇。我们被吸引到一种关注显现之物的模式中(如在电影的动态影像中),我们被召唤失去自我,以一种新的方式出现在熟悉的世界对象和关系中。论文的第二部分想象了使我们在世界中的审美诠释运动成为可能的本体论条件:美的模式。为什么某些艺术作品(Gebilde)会熠熠生辉,召唤我们亲临其境?为了探究这个问题,我转向法国天主教哲学家雅克-马里坦(Jacques Maritain)的 "美 "与 "工艺 "概念。马里坦让我们(像伽达默尔一样)转向新柏拉图主义的 "美 "概念,但这一概念植根于托马斯-阿奎那的 "存在(即上帝)的奥秘 "概念。在他的解读中,我们对艺术的诠释学体验(以及随之而来的我们在审美体验中的自我塑造运动)与艺术家参与美的模式以及她在手工艺的爱的劳动中丧失自我紧密相连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Journal of Philosophy of Education publishes articles representing a wide variety of philosophical traditions. They vary from examination of fundamental philosophical issues in their connection with education, to detailed critical engagement with current educational practice or policy from a philosophical point of view. The journal aims to promote rigorous thinking on educational matters and to identify and criticise the ideological forces shaping education. Ethical, political, aesthetic and epistemological dimensions of educational theory are amongst those covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信