Fetal Gestational Age Prediction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Three Biometric Techniques

Farzan Vahedifard, Xuchu Liu, Kranthi K. Marathu, H. Ai, M. Supanich, Mehmet Kocak, Seth Adler, Shehbaz M. Ansari, Melih Akyuz, Jubril O. Adepoju, Sharon Byrd
{"title":"Fetal Gestational Age Prediction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Three Biometric Techniques","authors":"Farzan Vahedifard, Xuchu Liu, Kranthi K. Marathu, H. Ai, M. Supanich, Mehmet Kocak, Seth Adler, Shehbaz M. Ansari, Melih Akyuz, Jubril O. Adepoju, Sharon Byrd","doi":"10.3390/reprodmed5030012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately predicting a fetus’s gestational age (GA) is crucial in prenatal care. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict GA using biometric measurements from fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the significance of using different reference standards for interpreting GA predictions. Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), fronto-occipital diameter (FOD), and head circumference (HC) were obtained from 52 normal fetal MRI cases from Rush University. Both manual and AI-based methods were utilized, and comparisons were made using three reference standards (Garel, Freq, and Bio). The AI model showed a strong correlation with manual measurements, particularly for HC, which exhibited the highest correlation with actual values. Differences between GA predictions and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) records varied by reference, ranging from 0.47 to 2.17 weeks for BPD, 0.46 to 2.26 weeks for FOD, and 0.75 to 1.74 weeks for HC. Pearson correlation coefficients between PACS records and GA predictions exceeded 0.97 across all references. In conclusion, the AI model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting GA from fetal brain MRI measurements. This approach offers improved accuracy and convenience over manual methods, highlighting the potential of AI in enhancing prenatal care through precise GA estimation.","PeriodicalId":516007,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately predicting a fetus’s gestational age (GA) is crucial in prenatal care. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict GA using biometric measurements from fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the significance of using different reference standards for interpreting GA predictions. Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), fronto-occipital diameter (FOD), and head circumference (HC) were obtained from 52 normal fetal MRI cases from Rush University. Both manual and AI-based methods were utilized, and comparisons were made using three reference standards (Garel, Freq, and Bio). The AI model showed a strong correlation with manual measurements, particularly for HC, which exhibited the highest correlation with actual values. Differences between GA predictions and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) records varied by reference, ranging from 0.47 to 2.17 weeks for BPD, 0.46 to 2.26 weeks for FOD, and 0.75 to 1.74 weeks for HC. Pearson correlation coefficients between PACS records and GA predictions exceeded 0.97 across all references. In conclusion, the AI model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting GA from fetal brain MRI measurements. This approach offers improved accuracy and convenience over manual methods, highlighting the potential of AI in enhancing prenatal care through precise GA estimation.
利用人工智能预测脑磁共振成像中的胎儿妊娠年龄:三种生物识别技术的比较研究
准确预测胎儿的胎龄(GA)在产前护理中至关重要。本研究旨在开发一种人工智能(AI)模型,利用胎儿脑磁共振成像(MRI)的生物测量数据预测胎龄。我们评估了使用不同参考标准解释 GA 预测的意义。我们从拉什大学的 52 个正常胎儿 MRI 病例中获得了双顶径 (BPD)、前枕径 (FOD) 和头围 (HC) 的测量值。该研究同时采用了手动和人工智能方法,并使用三种参考标准(Garel、Freq 和 Bio)进行了比较。人工智能模型与人工测量结果有很强的相关性,尤其是 HC,与实际值的相关性最高。GA 预测值与图片存档和通信系统 (PACS) 记录之间的差异因参照物而异,BPD 为 0.47 到 2.17 周,FOD 为 0.46 到 2.26 周,HC 为 0.75 到 1.74 周。在所有参考文献中,PACS 记录和 GA 预测之间的皮尔逊相关系数都超过了 0.97。总之,人工智能模型在根据胎儿脑部核磁共振成像测量结果预测GA方面表现出很高的准确性。这种方法比人工方法更准确、更方便,突出了人工智能通过精确预测GA来提高产前保健水平的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信