The Practicability of Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Promoting Tanzanian Universities’ Compliance

Q2 Social Sciences
Daudi Mrema, Irénée Ndayambaje, Philothère Ntawiha, Eugene Ndabaga
{"title":"The Practicability of Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Promoting Tanzanian Universities’ Compliance","authors":"Daudi Mrema, Irénée Ndayambaje, Philothère Ntawiha, Eugene Ndabaga","doi":"10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compliance with any policies, laws and regulations, including university compliance with quality assurance mechanisms globally, depends on the practicability of those mechanisms. Like other countries, Tanzania has quality assurance mechanisms that require universities to comply. However, the existing audit reports have shown non-compliance cases to such mechanisms. This study sought to explore the practicability of the existing quality assurance mechanisms in promoting universities’ compliance in Tanzania. The documentary reviews, interviews, and focus group discussions were used to collect data from the 4 universities and 46 students, academics, and quality assurance directors and officers as a sample size selected purposively. The data were analysed through content analysis. The findings revealed that the existing quality assurance mechanisms are generally practicable; however, there are quality assurance requirements with practicability challenges due to contextual factors. Such requirements include senior academics in administrative duties, academics’ promotion, academics’ recruitment, inclusive and participatory teaching approaches, requirements with extra financial costs, examination scripts’ marking, and invigilation restrictions. This study concludes that the practicability challenges of some quality assurance mechanisms are one reason for non-compliance cases at some Tanzanian universities. It recommends that key stakeholders be involved in establishing mechanisms, and all contextual factors must be addressed to enhance practicability.","PeriodicalId":37122,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Educational Research","volume":"24 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compliance with any policies, laws and regulations, including university compliance with quality assurance mechanisms globally, depends on the practicability of those mechanisms. Like other countries, Tanzania has quality assurance mechanisms that require universities to comply. However, the existing audit reports have shown non-compliance cases to such mechanisms. This study sought to explore the practicability of the existing quality assurance mechanisms in promoting universities’ compliance in Tanzania. The documentary reviews, interviews, and focus group discussions were used to collect data from the 4 universities and 46 students, academics, and quality assurance directors and officers as a sample size selected purposively. The data were analysed through content analysis. The findings revealed that the existing quality assurance mechanisms are generally practicable; however, there are quality assurance requirements with practicability challenges due to contextual factors. Such requirements include senior academics in administrative duties, academics’ promotion, academics’ recruitment, inclusive and participatory teaching approaches, requirements with extra financial costs, examination scripts’ marking, and invigilation restrictions. This study concludes that the practicability challenges of some quality assurance mechanisms are one reason for non-compliance cases at some Tanzanian universities. It recommends that key stakeholders be involved in establishing mechanisms, and all contextual factors must be addressed to enhance practicability.
质量保证机制在促进坦桑尼亚大学遵纪守法方面的实用性
遵守任何政策、法律和法规,包括大学遵守全球质量保证机制,都取决于这些机制是否切实可行。与其他国家一样,坦桑尼亚也有要求大学遵守的质量保证机制。然而,现有的审计报告显示存在不遵守这些机制的情况。本研究旨在探讨现有质量保证机制在促进坦桑尼亚各大学遵守规定方面的实用性。研究采用了文件审查、访谈和焦点小组讨论等方法,从 4 所大学和 46 名学生、学者、质量保证主管和官员中收集数据,并有目的地进行抽样调查。通过内容分析对数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,现有的质量保证机制总体上切实可行,但由于环境因素,一些质量保证要求在实用性方面存在挑战。这些要求包括担任行政职务的资深学者、学者晋升、学者招聘、包容性和参与性教学方法、需要额外财务成本的要求、考试阅卷和监考限制。本研究得出结论,一些质量保证机制的实用性挑战是坦桑尼亚一些大学出现违规案例的原因之一。研究建议,关键利益相关者应参与机制的建立,而且必须解决所有背景因素,以提高实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Educational Research
European Journal of Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信